<p>:) i pray to god that i do get that…i hope the fun fact was correct…grrrrrrrr…then i would get like 10-20 points higher…uggh…but we got all the answers down…so thats pretty amazing…67…</p>
<p>Yea! The entire list is on page 73, right?</p>
<p>About what range do you think 1 omit and 3-7 wrong would be?</p>
<p>have we come to an agreement about the phenomenon/theory question? or is that too hard to be debated</p>
<p>also, i think(hope) that this test will have a lenient curve. in my opinion, the CR was pretty tough. at least, some questions were fairly easy while others were almost ridiculously difficult.</p>
<p>@ akak 3-7 wrong would be like 710-790.</p>
<p>@evilla
I think it is still in debate.</p>
<p>Curve will be average or lenient.</p>
<p>On the last 4 practice QAS/BB CR tests I have taken, I got 1-3 wrong, which is like 770-800. On this I have 3-5 wrong. I would be surprised if the curve isn’t semi lenient, especially when you take into account the vocab which I would expect many non-cc’ers to get wrong.</p>
<p>Please be lenient curve. Please…I really want to be done with this test.</p>
<p>sorry this question doesn’t really have anything to do with the SAT but i was just wondering i changed a few of my answers and even when i erased them there was some pencil mark left… im kinda scared my stuff will be marked wrong even if i chnaged it to make it right… is that possible or do they double check scantrons</p>
<p>Well you can order a regrading (or so I’ve heard) for a price if you truly believe they graded wrong.</p>
<p>This definitely has to be scaled more leniently. My BB Practice tests have me going from 1-2 wrong each critical reading section. Got -4 this time around ._.</p>
<p>I wouldn’t jump to conclusions yet on your CR score. Many of these answers are still really debatable in my eyes and we lose a lot of clarity when trying to remember these questions without the test right in front of us. I left the test center feeling great about CR and this thread has just ruined my positive feelings haha, so I think I’m really starting to over-think this whole section.</p>
<p>@msteiny1212 Same here. I felt more confident. Now I’m iffy on a couple more questions</p>
<p>Yeah I just trust the fact that I was confident DURING the test as opposed to this distorted prognostication 36 hours after the test. I see the point of this thread but I just don’t think we should be mourning our CR scores just yet.</p>
<p>For the very last question on the traffic passage…
wasnt it like exploring the challenges or something along those lines</p>
<p>Was the art critic looking back at her career an experimental?</p>
<p>yes, art critic looking back was experimental. i had experimental math and did not have that</p>
<p>was there an answer i forgot which passage but it was like imploring something??</p>
<p>When the first electric car debuted in mid-nineteenth-century England, the speed limit was hastily set at 4 miles per hour — the speed at which a man carrying a red flag could run ahead of a car entering a town, an event that was still a quite rare occurrence. </p>
<p>for entertainment or whatever?</p>
<p>yes 10char</p>
<p>@Khuam17 That’s one of the hotly debated questions. I put entertaining historical fact, emphasizing the man carrying the red flag and stuff. But others put landmark decision because it set a speed limit. We haven’t seemed to reach a consensus, though I personally think it was an entertaining historical fact (trying to save my CR score haha)</p>
<p>i forgot the other choices but at the time i was 100% sure that it was an entertaining historical fact.</p>