<p>i think it was more competitive</p>
<p>X species was more competitive…carrying capacity was 400. and the question about what would happen if it was doubled…Y would double, but X would level off at 400 (carrying capacity)</p>
<p>And it was 2 generations, spoo</p>
<p>I put 2 generations. (1 generation creates heterozygous, 2nd creates dihybrid cross - 9:3:3:1)</p>
<p>No for the doubling it was they would remain the same as now because the amount of food isn’t changing, so carrying capacity would stay the same therefore the equilibrium would be constant</p>
<p>only one wrong so far with the “which species are most related” phylogeny chart…it was b/c i put a/b</p>
<p>Tundra and desert for sure.
Not sure what happens if populations doubled.</p>
<p>Park I think it was c/d</p>
<p>wht about the one where it was how many gametes from AaBb?</p>
<p>@parklife…was that the one with the splitting apart stems and such?</p>
<p>Yes I had c/d as well. And equilibrium too!
4 gametes.</p>
<p>c/d? i thought it was b/c cuz on an online study guide thats what the answer was… oh well still got it wrong…</p>
<p>i put that the level would go back to the original level even if the populations doubled</p>
<p>It was also 2 spoo</p>
<p>oh and why can a new plant grow from the cell of the phloem?</p>
<p>@imaboss yeah that question</p>
<p>OH, what does the vascular cambium do?</p>
<p>Vascular cambium was lateral growth for woody plants</p>
<p>for any1 who took m</p>
<p>the yeast question… “what’s the best conclusion” was it that yeast make medium more acidic?</p>
<p>For the three test tubes did you get protein in b as the conclusion?</p>