<p>I say we make a chart that lists UW GPA (on 100pt scale) to SAT. This is what its like at my school. I’ll start:</p>
<p>100 = 2400
95 = 2300
90 = 2100
85 = 1900
80 = 1700
75 = 1500</p>
<p>(for the record, I’m 93 and 2300)</p>
<p>I say we make a chart that lists UW GPA (on 100pt scale) to SAT. This is what its like at my school. I’ll start:</p>
<p>100 = 2400
95 = 2300
90 = 2100
85 = 1900
80 = 1700
75 = 1500</p>
<p>(for the record, I’m 93 and 2300)</p>
<p>It might be more meaningful to compare it to rank rather than to GPA (especially because 100-point GPA scales are foreign to many people). Still probably not very meaningful, though. :)</p>
<p>Ok… Rank:</p>
<p>val = 2300
sal = 2200
top 10% = 2000
top 25% = 1800</p>
<p>(… I’m val)</p>
<p>Val got 2360
Sal got 2350
top 10% = 2200ish
top 25% = 2000ish
50% = 1800</p>
<p>Our Valedictorian last year got a perfect score. No idea about this year’s, but some junior just got one too.</p>
<p>Around here Top 10% is about 2200, Top 25% is about 1900, and Top 50% is around 1500.</p>
<p>I’m in the top quarter and I got a 1900. So yeah.</p>
<p>Our Val got 2300</p>
<p>Our rank 20 or so got 2400</p>
<p>Anyone in the top 50/700 probably got a 220+</p>
<p>Grades at my school are unweighted… so even though I’m like #3, I have the highest SAT score in my class. </p>
<p>valedictorian - 1890
top 5% - 1800-2000
top 10% - 1600-1800
AKA my school isn’t very good hahah</p>
<p>I got a 2170. Nothing to brag about on CC hahah</p>
<p>val-100 (4.0 unweighted) and 2400</p>
<p>^pssh what a nerd :P</p>
<p>Sent from my SGH-T959V using CC</p>
<p>Val: 2260
Sal: ~2200
Me (~top 10%): 2300+</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>I’m barely top 25% (might even be top 50%), but I have a 2100. If only I studied for the SAT!</p>
<p>I think Sal got like 2370, but I’m not sure about Val.</p>
<p>we don’t do class rank, but</p>
<p>95 = 2300+
90 = 2180ish (this is our average)
below 90 = below 2150</p>