Back from Mainland China (which was great by the way!)
So funny to read this as, most of the fantasy and sci fi readers I know are the most logical analytic people I know - scientists and programmers. I think they are often a way to explore ideas.
I too would have preferred the change of narrators to be more clearly delineated. At first I thought we would just switch from Miriam to Wanda, so when we got Stephon, I was really taken aback. For some reason I thought we’d only have female narrators.
Does anyone know how Miriam’s mother became a snow tree?
Yes, having I thought Stephon might be on the spectrum, but more or less on the normal side.
I’m rereading the book because I whizzed through a bit too quickly the first time. I’m not sure that Novik really had her magical world all figured out, but I did love the idea of the Staryk world that coexists with ours on a slightly different plane. And I very much liked how Miriam learns to make the way their society works to her favor. And I loved that the cabin in the woods existed in both worlds.
Many libraries shelve sci-fi and fantasy together because there is a lot of overlap, both in who reads them, how the awards work (Hugo and Nebula are for either genre.) As Arthur C. Clarke said, “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” There are some sci fi novels that have both spaceships and magic.
I thought that inserting Judaism into the story was an interesting choice. I can’t think of too many fantasies that use real world religions, at least that I’ve read. (I did love the line about Miriam saying there were at least three righteous men in Staryk.) I’m not bothered at all about the more fantastical aspects of the story, but I do think one of the challenges is for the author to convince you to believe in their world. That means the magic has to have rules that work and seem consistent. I’m not sure Novik totally succeeded here. OTOH, I find authors like Brandon Sanderson who obsess about having a magical world that is planned to the last blade of glass more annoying.
I don’t think Novik wanted this to be just an escapist read. I think she had a lot of ideas she wanted us to think about. When do you have the responsibilty to act like a parent when your parents aren’t doing their job? Do you do what’s right for yourself? for the family? the kingdom? Miriam, Irina and Wanda all have to struggle with these ideas. Are the Staryk’s idea of balance better or worse that the idea of giving freely?
I actually thought the book should have been longer. I was never bored, but I did think that there were things that got glossed over. I don’t think a good fantasy should make you feel like you are being force to make leaps of faith.