I think Ashley is beautiful but something doesn’t add up. Most articles say she wears a size 16, but her stats are listed as 38-30-46, 165 lbs, 5 9". That is not a size 16 by any stretch.
Being someone of similar height, I totally buy being a size 16 for that weight and measurements, although I’m sure many styles don’t work on her due to her booty. And my guess is MANY men find her shape and her booty quite attractive.
“As for Cheryl Tiegs’ appearance - the woman is closing in on 70. At what age, do women get a pass on their “looks”.”
When they stop criticizing others’ in a sad attempt to stay relevant?