<p>Dig: we’re on the same page my friend. Funniest movie I have ever seen as well!!! Awful cinematorgraphy and even wrose acting. can you say “worst movie ever!” Even S. Darko was better than Twilight.</p>
<p>Anon: I read the first three chapters, hit myself upside the head, and closed the book (would have burned it if I had actually bought the book… had borrowed it from a friend) and never looked back. Thought I would give the movie a chance… bad idea. haha</p>
<p>You know our generation fails when we have sparkling vampires T_____T
S. Darko WAS better. Though I saw no point making a sequel to Donnie Darko…
At least S. Darko had Chuck Bass [Ed Westwick]</p>
<p>I liked the LOTR movies but just couldn’t get into the books…</p>
<p>I mean, c’mon, you can’t understand anything Tolkein says. At all. Maybe if I had a couple dictionaries and the Oxford writing department to help me decipher it…</p>
<p>;)</p>
<p>I’m not a fan of Ed Westwick either. I love Chase Crawford and the guy who plays Tripp Vanderbilt though. So attractive. It’s so sad that Serena had to choose between them. And that she chose Tripp!</p>
<p>Sorry, non Gossip Girl watchers.</p>
<p>Nitro - Did you just change your location based on our discussion? :)</p>
<p>anyone here a redskins fan? man they screwed another one up today.</p>
<p>HAHA S. Darko was so ridonkulous. ridonkulous, because my friends and I had a super long convo regarding which was a better way to describe the movie. an epic convo of ridiculously lousy vs. ridonkulous… haha that’s how bad the movie was. we had a great time watching it though lol.</p>
<p>im confused :(</p>
<p>@diglett: dont you DARE say that its our generation, those tweens have no connection to us beyond the fact that we share an ancestry…</p>
<p>Nitro: I’m sorry but it’s both… the tweens and our gen… sadly enough</p>
<p>wow what are we talking about? fantasy? Vampires? Twilight sucking?</p>
<p>We have the attention spans of ants haha.</p>
<p>haha… </p>
<p>another day off for me… education strike.</p>
<p>the week goes by a lot faster than the weekend, next weekend will be here in no time!</p>
<p>Gah! Donnie Darko was -fantastic-. I wholeheartedly agree, Diglett… there was no need for a sequel. >_></p>
<p>As far as the whole Dec. 11th/Dec. 15th issue goes, the only thing that really needs to be considered here is whether Stanford has released decisions early in the past, not what day of the week decisions will be released. Does it make sense that they could release them on Friday, based on the reasons provided by Prussia! much earlier in the thread? Yes, but I think what’s more important here is precedent. If they haven’t released decisions in past years earlier than they’ve publicly announced, then I think it’s a safe bet we’ll be hearing on the fifteenth.</p>
<p>they have released them early in the past. But keep in mind originally they said decisions will be sent by the 15th, but on [Admission</a> News : Stanford University](<a href=“Page Not Found : Stanford University”>Page Not Found : Stanford University) they clearly say ON the 15th. So while I think it is possible that they release them early I bet that they come out on the 15th.</p>
<p>Well they have released them early in the past (same case last year, released them the Friday before than on the 15th) but they went as far as to actually announce the date so close to release (referring to the post on their site).</p>
<p>I was living in dorms during my summer college class when I saw Donnie Darko , and my roommate and I had to let one of the girls who had a single live with us till the end of term because she started having Frank nightmares and her room faced the football field (meaning no lights, no people or anything on that side… all by her lonesome self )haha.</p>
<p>espically when said announcement came out 9/13 days before the 11th/15th release dates, seems kind of strange to say somthing so explicit and contradict it so close to the time when it was anounced…</p>
<p>I just really wanted 3399 haha</p>
<p>3400!!!</p>