<p>I am a student, but I was instantly enthralled when I passed by this thread. My two cents on the topics under discussion-</p>
<p>Homeschooling - I realize that the majority of you are mothers of teenage children and are in support of this concept, but I would like to shed light upon the opposite stance. I have lived in the Bay Area of California for all my life, and homeschooling is rather uncommon here. However, I have personally known a few homeschoolers yielding from a variety of family backgrounds. A few are completing their majors in prestigious unis (berkeley, stanford), while others are being treated for mental disorders or are following normal high school curriculum. To the religious conservatives, I realize that I cannot, and it is not my place to change your orientation, but I find homeschooling to be incredibly detrimental to a child’s personal growth. Social compatiblity in today’s world is founded on abundant human interaction, and homeschooled children lack this vital experience. You may say, “my child has plenty of outings with friends and peers and is exposed to plenty of family gatherings.” I would say that this is far from adequate. A growing individual needs exposure to the broadest range of human vices and complex relationships to stimulate maturity and mental preparedness when the time comes for college, marriage, and employment. Protecting and censoring a teenager from both the follies and strengths of his or her peers will eliminate a major aspect of social competency that is necessary especially in America. Secondly, I strongly believe that we young adults learn the most from our acquaintances and not from our textbooks. How is one to gauge ability and skill without a variety of competition to compare to? I have been driven to excel and dream largely because of my fellow students. I am NOT a conformist nor complacent student, yet I completely believe in this. Peers provide a stimulus and standard far beyond what dedicated parents can provide. </p>
<p>Male/Female Achievement Discrepancy - It is true that females often do better than their male peers in school nowadays. I am a male. When it comes to grades especially, females often outperform. This is because the fundamental concepts behind the education system is fashioned in a way that neglects inherent male behavior. We find it harder to sit still and pay attention in classrooms, listen to teachers and meticulously follow instructions, organize notes, and complete homework. The majority of females are far superior in these regards. </p>
<p>A brief background to my school - private, class size average of 8, 400 students in the upper school.
Acceptances -
Ivy Schools - 20%
UC Berkeley - 40%
Stanford - 15%</p>
<p>Me -
Junior, taking AP Bio, AP Chem, AP Calc, AP US, Spanish, English Honors
Grades - 1/3 B’s, rest A’s
SAT- 2260 (planning to retake)
SAT2 - Math2c 790, Chem 800, Bio 800
APs - anticipating all 5s</p>
<p>Now for the more controversial stuff. Although girls may outperform on paper, they still lag behind in standardized testing and other prestigiously recognized programs and rewards (on the regional and national level). I say this after years of observing and discussing such matters with my peers. It matters to us just as much, if not more than you parents. Girls make the grades, but less persistent males often achieve higher awards and scores on tests that purely measure cognition, reasoning, and aptitude. My school is host to a variety of brilliant students, but the so-called geniuses are more often male. This is not to discredit the competency of the female students but rather to show how natural male behavior often prevents teenagers especially from performing well in school.</p>
<p>On the behalf of all underachieving, rule-breaking, rebellious teenage males, I thank you for reading my point of view. If there are any questions or conflicting arguments I will be more than happy to respond to them.</p>
<p>-Eric</p>