I noticed the difference between the treatment of the son and daughter (maybe because that was always the dynamic in my own family) but mentally gave the family the benefit of doubt because something may have changed for them financially in the meantime. My husband had a stroke after our oldest committed to a college, and had been there a couple of years, so the financial changes only affected our daughters (but our son paid us back quite a bit later!).
I see families pursue only publics all the time, and guidance counselors we have worked with don’t really convey the possibilities that exist with privates, either through financial aid or merit awards.
I had a call from a friend whose daughter was feeling down because she was only applying to a state college (not a university, maybe this is what a directional is!), unlike her friends. I suggested she apply to a couple of small privates that she had a good chance at, so she could sit at the lunch table and discuss her choices with peers. The family was extremely surprised by the merit and financial aid offered when she got in to both these schools. She ended up choosing the state college in the end, but the family’s eyes were opened and the son later attended a private I believe.
The much maligned Harvard, which is actually a great experience for many, gives substantial aid to families making up to $150K (they pay 10% which is cheaper than any public). Those making under $65K go for free. There are other selective schools that give aid that is very generous. And others give merit to attract top students or those accomplished in certain areas. Private can end up being cheaper than public- but as we all know the middle group of families with incomes that seem high but cannot handle full pay, often suffer and their kids end up at publics.
If this decision reflects a lack of knowledge on the part of the family or guidance counselor, that is too bad. But there are also many good reasons to go to the directional. One of mine did that. She enjoyed the mixed ages and the more practical environment. She lived at home and then in an apartment and worked and was also able to take classes part-time, which suited her. However, I do think that the intellectual atmosphere is not optimal for some kids, and that would include motivation of peers, quality of faculty, and so on. For some kids, a school that is not challenging can actually drag them down or cause them to quit. So…it depends.
I can see why people think this is none of the original poster’s business, but I myself have felt sad watching this scenario with my kids’ classmates when I know it is because of lack of sophistication on the part of school and family. On the other hand, I have also seem some great kids thrive at the nearby state college, while living at home. The deli guy at our grocery store just finished last year and got a job with a fancy title, and he is radiant with success. Great kid, smart, hard-working, clear goals, and he is not untypical of the kids I know who went that route.