Someone wrote that some of the colleges I described “have wildly varying admissions standards” and “aren’t really in the same ballpark as UPS.” For example, Reed, Colorado College, Oberlin, Occidental and Macalester are much more selective than UPS, Lewis & Clark, Willamette, Beloit, Lawrence, etc…
I agree with everything that person said EXCEPT that the colleges “aren’t really in the same ballpark.”
Of course, for certain high school seniors with certain credentials, Reed, Colorado College, Oberlin, Occidental and Macalester would be unrealistic reaches, even though those same students might have excellent chances of getting into UPS, Lewis & Clark, Willamette, Lawrence or Beloit. But college admissions are unpredictable. And even putting aside that unpredictability, I still would say that all of those colleges ARE in the same “ballpark.” Many or most of the students accepted at each of those colleges have credentials that would put them somewhere in the middle of the pack of accepted students at all of the other colleges mentioned. Yes, Reed, Colorado College, Oberlin, Occidental and Macalester are much more selective, and “harder” to get into, than UPS, Willamette, Lewis & Clark, Beloit and Lawrence, but there is a lot of overlap among the student bodies, measured by the academic credentials of admitted students.
You can see one measure of the overlap by comparing the ACT and SAT stats for the various schools. At a certain point, there’s not that much overlap between colleges. The test scores of more than three quarters of Swarthmore and Pomona admitted students don’t overlap with the test scores of more than three quarters of UPS and Beloit admitted students. However, the test scores of Oberlin admitted students overlap quite a bit with the test scores of Swarthmore admitted students as well as the test scores of Beloit admitted students.
You also can see the overlap when you look at admissions to grad schools. If you peruse the lists of PhD candidates at major universities in particular schools or departments, you probably will find students who went to all of the colleges listed. Admittedly, you probably will find more (per capita) from Swarthmore or Pomona than Oberlin or Macalester, and more (per capita) from Oberlin and Macalester than Beloit or Lawrence, but you’ll find plenty from all of them.
I have no doubt that some people choose Oberlin over Swarthmore, even though there are plenty of people who get in to Oberlin but would not have been viable candidates for Swarthmore. And some people prefer Beloit, Lawrence and UPS to Reed, Colorado College and Oberlin, even though many of their future classmates at Beloit, Lawrence and UPS would not have had a prayer of getting into Reed, Colorado College or Oberlin.
To the students at the stronger end of the bell curve (and their parents), I’d say they may want to look at some of the less selective colleges, which may be better fits. And if the dice don’t roll their way and they end up having to go to one of the less selective colleges on the list even though they had hoped for a different outcome, they shouldn’t feel so bad, since the student body compositions, academic offerings, graduate school placements, etc. overlap quite a bit among colleges that some people initially may perceive not to be “in the same ballpark.”
To the students at the weaker end of the bell curve (and their parents), I’d say they may want to apply to some of the more selective colleges, but they may not, and again, if they don’t end up going to one of the more selective colleges, they needn’t feel so bad. One of the less selective colleges may be a better fit, and there will be smart and engaged students, excellent academic offerings, excellent grad school opportunities, and so on, at many of the less selective colleges I’ve been describing.