<p>[Ecological</a> succession - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia](<a href=“Ecological succession - Wikipedia”>Ecological succession - Wikipedia)</p>
<p>which one do you think it the best model? I like Whittaker’s, but that’s only on an intuitive bases (I need to look into this more).</p>
<p>I was sorely disappointed when I discovered this thread wasn’t about the science of orgasms.</p>
<p>^Oh dear. I also thought that’s what it would be about. It’s a good thing this is in the high school forum.</p>
<p>fooey. I wanted to hear about the science of orgasms. </p>
<p>As for the the actual question. I have no clue, nor do I particularly care. I much prefer science at the micro-level. Never really been interested in ecology ( not saying its not a very important/ interesting field) just never caught my fancy.</p>
<p>I agree with PioneerJones.</p>
<p>you noobs done got ■■■■■■■! I give this trolljob a 9/10.</p>
<p>■■■■■■■■ is too strong a word. It’s just one of a long series of threads with suggestive titles.</p>
<p>Darn… I was hoping as well actually.</p>
<p>me too. haha. We all have such dirty minds.</p>
<p>lol, I thought my mind was in the gutter. Glad I wasn’t the only one. We should hijack this thread to talk about real theories behind the nature of a “climax”. </p>
<p>In all seriousness, I do have a question about it. Why so males want to sleep after their climax? I am always so sleepy afterwards.</p>
<p>Sent from my PC36100 using CC App</p>
<p>Am I the only person who actually thought this was about ecology lol</p>
<p>wow, you did? How do you know about this? Do they cover it in AP bio?</p>
<p>^Nah I’m just kidding I thought it was sexual too :P</p>
<p>I thought, “Someone wants to be funny and is really talking about the climax of a book.”</p>
<p>Though I did learn about succession in my ecology courses.</p>
<p>
…You should probably Google that.</p>