<p>
<em>In my best Ogre voice</em> NERRRRRRRRRDDSS!</p>
<p>
<em>In my best Ogre voice</em> NERRRRRRRRRDDSS!</p>
<p>Yep Daniel, Haas is my first choice- honestly, I never anticipated applying to LA, I figured that they could see that I have geared my courses to fit the Haas requirements and would not want me. But, by offering a potential Regents scholarship, if I get it, it sure would make that school a lot more attractive. (thats the point right?)</p>
<p>c’mon people, make some predictions</p>
<p>Indeed it is, Austin. What do you plan to do with your degree? (I’m joining the Peace Corps and pursuing a M.Div. at Concordia seminary after undergrad.)</p>
<p>I plan on going to work for a couple of years in a “big company” (one that likes to pay for its employees to get masters degrees) and using my undergrad degree and grades to get into grad school (an MBA program at some prestigious university I hope) Right now, those are my goals- not very specific I know, but by following that plan I hope to give myself as many options as possible in the future.
May I ask what a M.Div is? maybe a Masters of ???</p>
<p>Good deal. The title of the degree–in its unabbreviated form–is Master of Divinity. It’s the first professional degree in the field of theology.</p>
<p>well, realistically im probably goign to be accepted to UCSD and USC, while rejection letters from Haas and UCLA are comming up.</p>
<p>hmm…realistically I should get into ucsd as well but will have a chance at getting rejected from Cal and UCLA.</p>
<p>Daniel, thats pretty cool, I assume you like thinking, but what aspect most interestes you in philosophy?</p>
<p>Hobo, I was unaware that you too applied to Haas… I’m sure I overlooked it somewhere in your posts. Good luck- even though we’re sort of in competition. Why do you believe that you will be denied admission?</p>
<p>I like the way in which philosophy in general tests your mind. For example, in today’s social and political climate, a great many people look at empiricism as a kind of “true religion” were there is no possibilty that a theory whose predictions are consistenly accurate could ever be wrong. Of course, what many people fail to notice is that even a naturalistic approach to the world rests on a few basic assumptions … assumptions that are easily challenged. </p>
<p>For example, observation is of paramount importance to the sciences. Is there really any way to know, with any sort of certainty, that our so-callled observations of the external world mesh with reality? Do other people really exist? I’m pretty sure that I exist due to the classic “cogito ergo sum …” formulation but it’s entirely possible that everything in the outside world is an illusion. Questions like these drive my interest. Everything can be questioned.</p>
<p>haha, i’ll need it.</p>
<p>Good luck to you… don’t take the competition thing too seriously.
i probably won’t be admitted because…</p>
<ol>
<li><p>my gpa isn’t that great (lower than haas and ucla average for business)</p></li>
<li><p>no good E.C’s</p></li>
<li><p>intercampus transfer.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>if i get in, its a miracle and i was probably a glitch in the system.</p>
<p>Daniel, I love thinking and discussing topics such as the ones you have brought up, but I always end up questioning what the goal is and where the questions stop. The fact that I seek answers where there are none and that you embrace these philosophical quandries demonstrates why you are pursuing your field of study and me, mine. Although, I really do like having these types of ideas presented and like to think them through intellectually, but as I said, I have to let them go.</p>
<p>Hobo, thats too bad- heek hoping for the miracle then.
no worries about the competition thing though… apps are in, its not like we can psych eachother out of applying (not that we would) but anyway ucsd and usc are great alternatives.</p>
<p>anyone wanna take a guess as to when the next batch of ucsd decisions come out?</p>
<p>i hear they release on saturdays.</p>
<p>Although my GPA isn’t terrible, it is lower than a 3.7-3.8 eek.</p>
<p>and i just started an internship, but i didn’t add it in my applicaiton (though i did put it on the Haas app)</p>
<p>How was ur Haas essay? mine was pretty bad lol…</p>
<p>Haha, i just hope my application is under yours and it gets thrown into the “accepted” pile with you on accident.</p>
<p>I answered the hurricane katrina question- It gave me an opportunity to tell them something they didn’t already know about me and showcases knowledge of current events. Here is the essay:
(If you are so inclined to copy it, don’t)
(thats a general “you” -not meant to you hobo)</p>
<p>The creation of classes may be a byproduct of the American economy, but the divide between rich and poor is certainly not an unmanageable phenomenon. Just as companies are encouraged to practice business ethics and create a sense of goodwill throughout their communities for economic benefit, they can be similarly encouraged to promote greater fiscal equity among the nations citizens. This equity, in contrast to equality, creates a system capable of functioning within Americas capitalistic economy. Although nobody, including the government, is legally responsible for bridging the gap between rich and poor, pursuit of a stronger and more equitable economic system must include private investment, as facilitated by government incentives. The realization provided by Hurricane Katrina, of social and economic divisions, might be a catalyst capable of drawing attention to this issue and providing an opportunity for growth.
Americas capitalistic economy does create a class system. Along with all of the opportunity, competition, progress and advantages it offers, it also creates a system in which some prosper immensely while others are left behind. If the U.S. economy were based on a communistic system, the responsibility of bridging the gap between rich and poor would fall on the government. This system focuses on equality, trying to give everyone not only the same opportunities, but also an equal outcome in life. However, in a purely capitalistic system, the governments laissez faire approach does not warrant taking a direct role in solving this problem. The U.S. Government is not purely capitalistic, as it tries to maintain a balance between a hands-off style and an interventionist approach. This exemplifies an equitable approach, trying to level the playing field while not determining the outcome of the game.
Many analysts support the potential for equitable re-growth in New Orleans. In an Inflation Data article titled, Hurricane Katrina: The Economics of Disaster, analysts state,
it is possible, if modernization occurs, that New Orleans could be cleaner, safer, more productive and efficient (and thus wealthier) in the long run. Although, it will suffer in the short run. This modernization can be achieved through incentives designed to attract private investment. The government could instill policies that encourage businesses to invest, and thereby aid, New Orleans in providing opportunities for disadvantaged individuals to help themselves through the creation of an equitable economy.
The United States history of racial discrimination and oppression has reverberations in todays economy. Although the creation of classes may be a byproduct of Americas economic system, measures can be taken to lessen its impact. Stimulating private investment and encouraging modernization of New Orleans are not legal responsibilities for anyone, but they are moral responsibilities for everyone. Integrity and ethics are integral aspects of business, and when faced with a disaster like Hurricane Katrina, businesses have a unique opportunity to implement these fundamental principles in making a lasting impact on the lives of those left behind: left behind by both the flood waters of Hurricane Katrina and the economic system our country is based on.</p>
<p>i did that as well… unfortunately its on my computer at home. I heard that berkeley students (the students that applied to Haas from UCB) had to do theirs on TiVo.</p>
<p>Austin, that’s cool. I was just answering your question. BTW, what stimulated your interest in your field?</p>
<p>My entire life I have been facinated with business’ dynamic nature. I started a small company and sold it in high school. I then started another business, a local production company, which I still run. Frankly, all aspects of business intrigue me. I like the idea of starting my own company, as well as the thought of being an executive manager or CEO type in a large already established company, presenting an entirely new set of challenges. Motivation, econ, psychology, finance, negotiation, ethics… its all in business, both in theory and in application.</p>
<p>anybody else gunna make predictions as to their acceptances/rejections? c’mon this is a relavant topic-
Perhaps the SB admisions have people out celebraring, or should I say practicing for their time at SB. (ha ha, perpetuating the party school image even further, sorry)</p>