<p>wow… umm… that’s encouraging! lol!</p>
<p>but seriously… is it TOTALLY impossible?? how about minoring?? or maybe spending 4.5 years…</p>
<p>Let’s put it this way. I’m trying to simply fit in all my classes for my lone CSE major so that I don’t have to go more than 4 years. Add in a minor, and its pretty much guaranteed more than 4 years.</p>
<p>Trust me, if you’re doing CSE major, you don’t want to major or minor in anything if you want to graduate in 4 years.</p>
<p>Hows this schedule:</p>
<p>EE 10
EE 101
EE 102
Physics 4BL</p>
<p>I’m going to be a second year EECE. (I didn’t know CS32 wasn’t offered in Fall :() So I’m behind. BTW Is Math61 worth taking?</p>
<p>I think that’s a pretty good schedule.
EE 10 is usually easy, Ozcan is teaching 101 (if u had him for EE 1 and did fine then you’ll be set), EE 102 is usually pretty good, but Levan isn’t teaching it =[ so iono… and 4BL will be… well… 4BL ;]</p>
<p>You are actually pretty ahead in EE classes, even though you are behind in CS classes. I didn’t take EE 10 or 102 until winter, and most people take 101 in winter too. Hopefully you don’t forget your CS by winter… Take CS 32 with Nachenberg in the winter if he is still teaching! Then you can take CS 33 in the spring with the new professor for it, Reinman.</p>
<p>Thanks zero. btw, does ozcan usually have such a light curve? A friend got 75% and Still had an A-</p>
<p>npnp</p>
<p>I think he’s usually pretty friendly with the curve… My friend was like bottom 25% and ended up in the B area (I THINK)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>It will depend entirely on you. How ambitious are you? How self-driven are you do spend a lot of time on your classes? What kind of GPA range are you aiming for? How naturally smart are you? i.e. how fast you can read and actually retain and learn the material. That will determine if you can take up to 5 classes a quarter and take a full load on your first two summers, assuming you would like to do summer internship later summers.</p>
<p>It’s not impossible. I’m sure very smart students will have no trouble.</p>
<p>I was wondering for anyone with industry knowledge, if I am majoring in MechE and don’t have any desire to work in the defense industry(Lockheed,NG,Raytheon), I was wondering if there are still many options that I have as far as career paths go.</p>
<p>Yea there are tons. You can go into the medical field and help design medical devices like heart shunts and stuff like that. Pretty much every area can use a meche i’m guessing.</p>
<p>Ok my schedule is kind of looking like this:</p>
<p>CS M151B
CS 180
Stats 100A
Physics 4BL
GE</p>
<p>Anyone think that is too much? Since there doesn’t seem to be a lot of programming in the cs classes I’m hoping that maybe I could handle this. If not, I could always drop the GE halfway through I suppose.</p>
<p>Oh and for some reason, Gupta is the only lecture listed for CS M151B and right now its all closed with 0 out of 0 enrolled, anyone know why it’s like that? And anyone have any input on what I should use my first pass one? I was thinking both CS classes and 4bl, but I don’t know how fast stats fills up.</p>
<p>
Gupta is a professor in the EE department so you’ll have to enroll into EEM116C (even though they’re the same class). Also, I heard Gupta is one of the worst professors in the EE department (although that doesn’t really matter for the lab course lol)</p>
<p>The schedule doesn’t seem TOO bad BUT it’s still pretty nasty since you’re taking the two labs…which take up a lot of time. I’d drop CSM151B but I don’t know how you planned out your schedule so you may want to drop your GE. But you’re the CS genius so maybe you’ll find CSM151B easy…just joking :)</p>
<p>Oh and also I think Meyerson is teaching CS180 again next quarter so you’ll have projects (for a class that’s not supposed to involve coding.)</p>
<p>How is this schedule?</p>
<p>MSE 110
MSE 110L
MSE 130
EE M150
EE M150L</p>
<p>I’m thinking about taking MSE M105 (for engr sci TBA) instead of EE 150/L if 150 and 150L is too much with those MSE classes. Anyone here taken EE M150 and M150L?</p>
<p>^ do you mean CM150 and CM150L? I don’t think you’ll meet many, if any, EE doing either the solid state or MEMS pathways. :(</p>
<p>^ Yes. Just curious, but why are there so few EE doing the solid state or MEMS pathways?</p>
<p>imrightuarewrong: Stats 100A was easy when I took it. I think over half the class got A’s. Not sure about the other classes though…</p>
<p>MadeInChina, is cs m151b a lab course? It’s just listed as computer systems architecture and is a 4 unit class.</p>
<p>Also, what if I swapped cs 180 with ee 102? How hard is 102 supposed to be? The professor is some guy named balakrishnan.</p>
<p>And also, does anyone know another good place to find reviews about professors? Bruinwalk doesn’t work AT ALL and it’s really annoying not knowing anything about these professors that I’m picking.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Crap I completely confused CSM151B with CSM152A (sorry!!). All the rest about EEM116C is correct, but instead of it being a lab class, it’s a regular lecture course about computer architecture. Difficulty varies depending on your interest and learning skills and blah blah.</p>
<p>And again CS180 and EE102 difficulty is relative. I thought EE102 was easier but that doesn’t mean much to you.</p>
<p>Hello people
i would like some feedback on my fall quarter schedule.
Aerospace Engineering, Community college transfer</p>
<p>EE100 4 units
MAE102 4 units
MAE103 4 units
MAE182A 4 units</p>
<p>i’m a very social person and i plan on working 10 hours a week. Please rate the difficulty of this classes and what to expect with this load as they are all engineering courses
Thanks!</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>It’s because most people find semiconductor physics hard to grasp in general (for solid state) - EE121B is considered to be a pretty difficult course and most people don’t wish to repeat similar experience in the rest of the classes in the series. And because of that, the classes offered each quarter for that pathway have a tendency to get cancelled due to lack of interest. This in turn, makes it very unattractive for others (like me) to consider pursuing the pathway due to the dangers of not being able to take the (very limited) specified courses that fulfill the requirements.</p>
<p>I really enjoyed EE121B and wanted to go into solid state but due to the aforementioned reason, I started looking at the other pathways. I personally decided to go with MEMS actually since it’s the 2nd closest pathway but allows for courses like EE115B and EE163A which are part of other pathways so I know it’s a safe bet. Plus it’ll still give me the opportunity to take the EE122L (the lab that supposedly requires UCLA pay 15k to operate a year) and EE129D with Chui (my fav prof :)).</p>
<p>Overall though it seems that most people like circuits very much so they just naturally go to that pathway…</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Difficulty:
EE100 - 7.5/10
MAE102 - 8.5/10
MAE103 - 8/10
MAE182A - 9/10</p>
<p>These difficulty ratings are based on mastery of all the course material. If you are willing to do the minimum work just to pass the course, the difficulty ratings should be lower.</p>
<p>With your schedule, your weekends should be free as long as you work hard everyday during the weekdays. That’s my opinion.</p>