I’m glad things work out for the many, many parents who sing the praises and preach to me the benefits of using medication as part of an approach to address their children’s challenges. Truly each child, family, and circumstance is unique. What worked for a particular child in a particular family, given a particular situation is unique. Each body and mind interacts with psychoactive medication individually. And while clinical trials tell us generalizations can be made, even an individual’s reaction to medication changes over time, owing to everything from growth and development to homeostatic regulation of the drug’s targets (aka tolerance). The brain is supremely complex, unique, and, in a child, rapidly developing.
I’m keeping an open mind. S1 has a relationship with a psychiatrist, and he continues to work on his challenges through therapy. At no point in time has his psychiatrist sounded the alarm that by declining to utilize medication we are making en error in judgement.
What I wanted to emphasize here was the interesting parenting paradox that I face (and that I’m sure is quite common): S1’s strengths are also his challenges.
That burning emotional intensity IS his motivation for his passion: climate change. His live-mindedness, insatiable curiosity and urge to share his interests with others IS an immense internal distraction. His comfort level challenging authority, while VERY PROBLEMATIC FOR TEACHERS AND SCHOOL STAFF IS the core of his inner social justice warrior, and stimulates his interest in studying political power and economics. (Side note: I recently asked him if he would like to live on some kind of eco-commune some day. One of these off-grid, intentional communities. He immediately replied that while “nice” it doesn’t scale. “I want to be the Standard Oil of green energy” was his verbatim reply. Standard Oil was broken up, but he emphasized that “a monopoly” was part of the goal. I still don’t quite get it but nevermind…)
In the “2e” (twice exceptional or gifted with disabilities) universe, some parents strive to address their child’s disability so that the giftedness can shine through, or at least so the disability doesn’t hold them back from a “mainstream” experience, particularly academically. Other parents take the opposite view and insist that their “uniquely wired children” are the change-makers and iconoclasts. In this interpretation, ADHD is not a disability but a gift, allowing the child to make connections others wouldn’t see, and autism is what e.g. gives some scientists their power to hyperfocus on a topic of interest and develop encyclopedia knowledge.
I fall somewhere between these two camps.
While, as I’ve stated, I believe S1’s challenges are also his strengths, I am very mindful that they negatively impact his ability to master basic, age-appropriate life skills. Like presenting challenge to power with a bit more tact and respect and just ‘getting on with’ life’s boring bits. In these and related areas, he needs my guidance and support to grow and learn.
Nothing here is easy.
) she has a science related background - maybe even child development - which can make not knowing the right recipe even more frustrating.