<p>I agree, although you completely misinterpreted my ‘Go Bears’ comment. It was in reference to the Cal-Stanford rivalry, a playful jab at wahoomb’s current grad school. I have repeatedly supported UVA when compared to top private universities (and have put it on-part with top publics) in terms of the education it provides. I honestly believe education is what one makes of it- you can get a great education at UVA, or a lousy one, just like any other school (including HYPS), depending upon the initiative one is willing to take.</p>
<p>UVA was one of the schools at the top of my list- yes, even over top private universities- because I believe in the value and mission of a public education.</p>
<p>I’m glad to see so many young people- Laura and all others (including those in the Marshall, Truman, Fulbright, Goldwater, etc. competitions as well)- contributing so much to society at such a young age. It is certainly inspiring to see so many universities, public and private, across the country pushing their students to such high academic and personal standards.</p>
<p>Lastly, I still fail to see how zap’s comment “Glad to see that, too. Congratulations to UVA’s Rhodes Scholar. I’m also glad to see that U Oklahoma, U Delaware, Brooklyn College, UNC-CH, U GA, U Iowa, Indiana U, Montana St. U, and UC-Irvine also educate some of the brightest minds in America!” is ‘condescending,’ or patronizing. I rarely get on this website anymore (primarily for this reason- too many people have their undies in a bunch), so no reply is necessary, but I did want to note that as an outsider with no connection to UVA, I thought zap’s comment merely supports your argument, noting that it’s nice to see some different schools- outside of Harvard/Yale/UC- represented on the list. </p>
<p>Regardless, I don’t want this to detract from the original intent of the thread, as happens all too often on CC, so I’ll leave it at that.</p>
<p>Congrats to all Rhodes Scholars for their incredible achievements.</p>