Wealth, Power, Alcohol and Unruly Teenagers

<p>

</p>

<p>Here’s what the BBC has to say about Sweden’s low drinking rate: "This has been due to a consistent national alcohol policy with a state monopoly on the sale of alcoholic beverages, strict rules on sales of alcohol to minors (defined in Sweden as under 20) and high alcohol prices. "</p>

<p>So yeah, the drinking level there is all about the laws.</p>

<p>I don’t know what to say for Israel. </p>

<p>I don’t agree with the current drinking age, but I don’t think lowering it will turn us into a France or an Italy in terms of drinking either. I think the amount of drinking would stay the same or increase slightly.</p>

<p>There are many things communities and colleges can do to prevent binge drinking outside of having police officers spend their time searching out kids. Binge drinking scares me…far more than four to six two hundred pound boys sharing an illicit 12 pack with no hope of getting more beer. Large high school parties with no parents present scare me. So far the colleges my oldest attend have not scared me. Not all colleges have elevated binge drinking to a sport.</p>

<p>Back to the knife in school thing, our D brought a plastic knife to school the other day to spread cream cheese on crackers for lunch. I kept waiting all day to get a call from the school to come pick her up for bringing that to school. I have no idea if it was “legal” or not but thankfully she was not expelled :slight_smile: . 15 years ago I wouldn’t have even thought twice about her packing a real butter knife in her lunch bag.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Lol, where did you go to school where kids could smoke ANYTHING in class, much less weed? I went to high school in the 70’s, and no way would that have happened. </p>

<p>In fact, weren’t the legal consequences of smoking pot in the 70’s much harsher than now?</p>

<p>SteveMA I agree, the ‘zero tolerance’ standard at times is too blunt a tool for effective use when it comes to youthful indiscretions.</p>

<p>From the accounts I have read about the incident in McLean, the police indiscriminately got rough with kids who were just standing in line to order at McDonalds. Apparently a ‘wrong place, wrong time’ scenario. In a interview I saw, a parent said that he had no plans to bring a lawsuit; he just wants an apology for the injuries he said his son sustained from what he called an overreaction by police officers.</p>

<p>*Lol, where did you go to school where kids could smoke ANYTHING in class, much less weed? I went to high school in the 70’s, and no way would that have happened. </p>

<p>In fact, weren’t the legal consequences of smoking pot in the 70’s much harsher than now?*</p>

<p>Where I went to high school there was a “smoking” bathroom. No, it wasn’t legal, but it was the bathroom where students would go to smoke. -(cigarettes-they went off campus to smoke pot) Unfortunately, it was also the most conveniently located as it was at the top of the central staircase. I tried not to use the bathroom at school-but when I was in 10th grade, I happened to be in the room when the vice-principal did a " sweep" and suspended for a week everyone inside.</p>

<p>I wouldn’t have been able to catch up to my classwork after a week, so I didn’t go back. Luckily my parents found me an alternative school that was more flexible.
I think in school suspensions could serve the same purpose for many offenses & wouldn’t put students at risk for dropping out. ( The administrations philosophy re the bathroom was- use another one)</p>

<p>^^^^Okay, but the post to which I responded spoke of kids smoking pot in class, and implicating it was tolerated. I’m just finding that hard to believe.</p>

<p>I find it hard to believe too, because it was less tolerated than it is now ( at least for adult users- I would say there still is not tolerance for teen users, nor should there be IMO)</p>

<p>We had a huge controversy in my area last year when a group of kids from a wealthy Catholic high school broke onto the campus after hours, got drunk and vandalized school property and then drove drunk. The principal banned the kids from prom, so the parents took over a very expensive catering hall and gave the banned kids and their chosen guests a private prom.</p>

<p>The principal banned the kids from prom, so the parents took over a very expensive catering hall and gave the banned kids and their chosen guests a private prom.</p>

<p>Oh yes- that reminds me- I forgot to teach my kids that the rules of civilized society don’t apply to them. :p</p>

<p>Mini - I just wanted to say thanks for the reference in your link. Those statistics on the prevalence of heavy drinking in Europe (versus the U.S.) are very complelling.</p>

<p>

In a way it was funny because they were all too stupid to realize that they were being done a favor. Had they accepted the prom ban, that would have been it, but since they didn’t, they were all subject to disciplinary proceedings and colleges notified. However, this is the Mob Wives community and demographic, so it’s open to question how many of thet kids involved were actually college bound.</p>

<p>“Mini - I just wanted to say thanks for the reference in your link. Those statistics on the prevalence of heavy drinking in Europe (versus the U.S.) are very compelling.”</p>

<p>You’re welcome. I have literally dozens more. The other thing that most folks don’t recognize it is the SUCCESS of current efforts, enforcement of laws, age 21 drinking age, changing of community norms. Youth drinking in the U.S.(high school age) is some 40% lower than it was in the early 1990s, even as it is soaring in northern Europe. You can find lots of the data through Monitoring the Future.</p>

<p>It is interesting looking at the stats, and what it suggests is that binge drinking is a problem in Europe, though the statistics don’t necessarily make a statement one way or the other. Some of the countries where underage drinking is common don’t have a much higher rate of binge drinking then the US, others have significantly higher ones so it is hard to tell a correlation either way. </p>

<p>I am not going to argue that the 21 age to buy alchohol is a bad thing, having been on a rescue squad when the drinking age was 18 I saw far too many kids messed up or killed because they drank and took out themselves and others to argue that one. I think limiting access made a big difference and as much of a libertarian as I am on things, I think it does make a difference. </p>

<p>On the other hand, I find things like the first chart they gave upsetting, because that ‘have you had a drink in the last 30 days’ is without context of what the drink was and how it happened. In many of the countries mentioned, having wine or beer with meals is still pretty common, but we are not talking getting drunk either. With younger kids, it tends to be wine diluted with water or a spritzer , it is only in the teen years that wine or beer is probably drunk in my experience and it is usually in the context of family meals. My problem is that survey assumes that is the same thing as the kid chugging six pack or drinking hard liquor, and it betrays to me the Carrie Nation, demon rum argument and that is hogwash. I have seen this all over, when my son was young my wife went to a liquor store to buy some beer and wine, we had guests coming over, and my son was helping push the cart like kids love to do (my wife was right there, and we are talking when he was 4 maybe?), and the owner went nuts, because in our fair state he could face penalties simply because the kid touched a cart with booze in it, and that is asinine. </p>

<p>Whether or not learning to drink at home is effective, I think part of the problem with liquor is that there is this schizophrenia out there about it, rather then treating it as it is, something that can be abused but also can be a regular part of life without causing destruction. We have a mass culture that celebrates drinking in many ways, not just advertising, but people’s stories and such, yet we also tell kids it is something to be feared or a taboo. The “just say no” policy is just as stupid as abstinence only, the kind of education they supposedly give about alchohol in school is all about the horrors of drinking, not the reality, they treat having a glass of wine with dinner the same as taking out a fifth of Vodka, and that is a recipe for disaster and like the old movie “Reefer madness”, it is idiotic</p>

<p>Not to mention what do kids see with adults? What are the numbers of binge drinking among legal adults? If adults are all so responsible, how come a good number of adults drink and not a little bit? And how does that influence what kids do? This isn’t just the US, mind you, people mention Northern Europe, the UK and Ireland or Russia, and guess what, folks, in those countries adult drinking is pretty heavy, in the cold northern climes it is a big activity and the old British Isles is pretty bad. My point being that if you want to stop binge drinking then maybe the adult culture needs to change, there are a lot of adults and parents who are doing exactly what we don’t want kids to do. Yes, making access harder helps, but if we are really worried about it, maybe adults need to model better behavior, too. Cops don’t have massive anti drinking and driving efforts out there on Super Bowl Sunday or New Years because adults are so responsible…</p>

<p>In terms of the whole thread, I tend to agree the zero tolerance approach is way off the deep end, common sense seems to have gone out the window. When I was growing up in the late 70’s, when there were kids caught with booze, the cops would take it away and give the kids a warning. I had one case where I was with a friend in my car, visiting some friends of his at a parking lot, and the cops showed up. Unknown to me, someone had put a case of beer in the trunk of my car when the cop showed up (easy to do, was a convertible and the trunk release was right there) cop ended up searching it (with my permission, since I didn’t know), and found it. I told him honestly it wasn’t mine, and he simply took it (sure the cops probably had a toot on it), and that was that. If that happened today, I am sure they would make a federal case out of it, I think the cop back then suspected I didn’t know what was going on but today? As they say on the Sopranos, fugedaboutit…I often wonder if maybe we didn’t go so far over the top, some of the glamour of drinking wouldn’t go with it <em>shrug</em></p>

<p>We seem to have criminalized adolescent mistakes. So, all the opportunity parents once had to just let the kid face the consequences, because the consequences taught them something, has vanished.</p>

<p>You can’t let your kid get arrested and charged for alcohol, because that will follow them around for too long, and effect their entire life, from where they can go to college, to potentially where they can work. The consequences are too much and they last too long.</p>

<p>It all arises from the “war on drugs,” which is really a war on our own citizens. So, a kid who got caught with a six pack and got taken home by the police and grounded or spent the night in the local jail, could “learn” from that, in the past. Now, however, the parents are in a mad dash to make sure they aren’t dinged for life.</p>

<p>In the meantime, from what we know of the brain, the kids are going to make mistakes. It’s made parenting in this country untenable, and it’s basically a war on our youth being waged by a generation who had more freedom to explore, make mistakes and have second and third chances than any other generation in the past. </p>

<p>In the end, you can blame the lawyers for their neverendingly new ways to bring a lawsuit, and the insurance companies for their neverending way of lobbying for laws to make sure they do not have to “pay.” </p>

<p>(Don’t misconstrue this as my condoning underage drinking, or parental support of underage drinking. We keep no alcohol in our house. fwiw.)</p>

<p>"We seem to have criminalized adolescent mistakes. So, all the opportunity parents once had to just let the kid face the consequences, because the consequences taught them something, has vanished.:</p>

<p>I think we have done just the opposite. We have transformed community laws and norms and expectations so that, in fact, far fewer of them are now “making mistakes” (when it comes to alcohol). High school alcohol is declining rapidly. </p>

<p>In our state, we’ve had one community pass the first “social hosting law”, which holds parents/property holders responsible for underage drinking parties held on their premises. How many prosecutions have we had? NONE. And that’s the way it should be, notes the police chief. If they do their job right, parents will have learned to work with their kids so such parties aren’t held, and the police won’t be necessary. </p>

<p>(By the way - newer brain research indicates that youth with “more mature brains” are those more, rather than less, likely to take risks. No surprise, really - look at 45-65 year old men.)</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>That thought has occurred to me as well, and I find it puzzling.</p>

<p>Why is it that our generation has become the “Helicopter Parent” generation when we were, by and large, NOT raised that way? How did the tide turn?</p>

<p>Well, I’m not actually only referring to alcohol.</p>

<p>I think the entire attitude our culture takes towards youthful indescretions has made youthful indescretions nearly impossible to get past. we make a “record” of everything and it follows the kids.</p>

<p>Sure, punish parents who host. we’ve had that law here for years, now. But, what does that have to do with how intensely we are coming down on the kids these days?</p>

<p>We have made parental intercession in any situation necessary in order to keep a kid from having consequences wayyyyy outside the bounds of what they should be. If you can’t ever afford to make a mistake, I don’t really know how you are going to be able to grow up and accept responsibility. And, as we are seeing, we have a generation having a heck of a hard time doing just that.</p>

<p>And, to be clear, as I was in my last post, I"m not condoning underage drinking or parental support of underage drinking, only a rollback on the way we are, as adults, reacting to these mistakes. Sure, punish the adults like adults, but punish the kids as if they are still learning, because they are.</p>

<p>“Sure, punish parents who host. we’ve had that law here for years, now.”</p>

<p>Really? Social hosting laws exist only in a few counties in California, New Mexico, and Mercer Island, Washington. (We are trying to get more.) (I think you mean laws against providing kids with booze, which is a different thing.)</p>

<p>I agree though that we’ve infantilized children (actually, infantilized adults, too.) Pretty soon, instead of 21 and 22, we’ll be calling them “eleventeen and twelveteen”. All that silly business about “the developing brain” (most of which is determined by the age of five, and if we could prevent “adverse childhood experiences”, we’d hardly have to worry about much of this stuff.</p>

<p>[ILCC</a> News Release](<a href=“ILCC”>ILCC)</p>