'Um, no. It’s not the same at all. That’s ludicrous, imo.
This kid was not beaten, he was not raped, he was (and is) ignored and neglected. How one copes with being raped and killed and how one copes with being neglected and ignored are very different.’
I didn’t say it was the same thing, it was an analogy.My point is there usually can be something worse, if someone is paralyzed in an accident, they could have died; if there father is an emotionally abusive ass, he could have physically hurt the spouse or kids, if he was a drunk, it could be worse, he could be a drunk who didn’t support his family, and the real point is saying it could be worse trivializes what someone is going through.
No, being beaten and raped or whatnot is not the same thing as being emotionally neglected, and I never said that. My point was that trivializing the pain of emotional neglect by saying that it could be worse is trivializing a very real issue, that is all, it is the old idea that emotions and pain don’t mean anything, that all that matters are concrete things like food and shelter and such, or that in comparison to worse trauma, what they are complaining about ‘doesn’t matter’.and it does matter. The implication is that since dear old dad provided food and a shelter (and note, he is not paying for college), that therefore it is no big deal, and I don’t buy that, not as an outside observer, and not as a father myself. I have run into plenty of guys like the father in this thread, people who are all so wonderful to outside people, bask in the glory of being seen as a ‘nice guy’, and could give a crap less about being there for his kids, and having known guys like that, it is because they don’t see a need or a ‘payoff’ in being there for his kids, or worse, assume that all they are required to do are the ‘tangible’ things.
