So the urban requirement is somewhat flexible-she says the larger the better, but as long as thereās more than just the college she will be happy. Suburban is fine if thereās an easy way to get to the city.
Anthropology is out-apparently that is āstaleā news Iām just learning of
But itās smart to start by looking at the program offerings-lots of the great suggestions donāt have linguistics majors. No Whitman, Occidental, Union, Connecticut, Lafayette, Case Western, St Olaf and Middlebury (strange-they have so many languages). Our flagship doesnāt have it either.
She says the type of linguistics she wants is historical and mainly computational-she codes, has math up to linear algebra. And then the neuroscience connections. Brandeis, Rochester, Umass and Tulane all look like they have good undergrad computational linguistics offerings. San Diego and Arizona have them too, but it seems they are less strong? Pittsburgh, Binghamton, William & Mary and Vermont do not seem to have much beyond one or two courses. We donāt know how to evaluate this, though-it could be that they arenāt emphasizing them. Anyone with more info about computational linguistics who is willing to suggest/clarify would be appreciated.
For W&M-she also doesnāt like that they listed under benefits for the 1693 scholars āTrips and programs (Examples: first-year canoe trip, FroYo Fridays, service day at the Rob Till Community Garden, escape rooms, trip to the VA Museum of Fine Arts, Homecoming, and Family Weekend).ā She says-āsounds dumb.ā Again
She is full of opinions today-in a way, itās good that Iām asking her when sheās not equivocating.
She doesnāt want Great Books-too āall over the place.ā She still wants to take lots of lit classes.
As for university size-she doesnāt mind if itās big as long as the classes are smaller. I donāt know if honors programs at state universities do this. I think having a niche major would-maybe linguistics counts. So would skipping to upper-level classes.
So as suggested by someone above, the five things would be-computational linguistics offered, small classes, most classmates at her academic level, as urban as possible, less than 50000 yearly.
I see that the two limiting factors are computational linguistics and less than 50000. We thought 100000 yearly was the rate only at the very top. Looks like thatās the rate at the top of the sliding scale at several of the privates, though. We may look at that again-the point is not to force them out of their interests. Itās how much weāre choosing to afford. The assumption was-tuition at the top is 60000, so they pay 10,000 of that plus room and board. But that is maybe out of date.
Thanks again, everyone.