<p>This is probably going to be longest post ever, so consider yourself forewarned.</p>
<p>Well, at the start of admissions season, I posted in parents cafe about a culture clash between my Indian parents and me, their Indian-American son. Here’s that thread: <a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=134441[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=134441</a>. The prevailing advice was to apply to colleges that were heavy on the merit aid.</p>
<p>Well, I followed that advice, and my parents decided to loosen up. Not materially, as in I still can’t date, and won’t be allowed to do so in college either, as far as they are concerned. But I’m allowed to hang out with my friends more and things like that. There’s a lot less tension in my house these days, so my plans have changed somewhat. All this has made it very hard to make a decision. Should I assume I can keep my parents placated and distant for four years, or should I go with the money, as planned earlier. Due to my admissions success, going with the money would definitely involve alienating the parents, who are hardly open to me going anywhere that isn’t part of the Ivy League. Anyway, here are the options under consideration: </p>
<p>Penn, specifically the Wharton School’s Vagelos Program in Life Sciences and Management: This program is essentially, How to be a Drug Industry CEO 101. I like biochem, and I like biz/econ, but I don’t know if I want to commit to studying a heavily science and management curriculum for four years. I’d be graduating with a marketable, if highly specialized, degree. Of course, my parents want me to get an MBA, so if I submatriculate into Wharton Grad after my third year, then I’d be facing 5 years of business school. If I went back a few years later, that’d be six years total. This choice involves giving up on the possibility of taking random esoteric courses or really exploring my diverse interests in college. I liked this option when I applied, but now that it’s in my lap, I don’t know so much. The positives are that’s it a school at which I’m comfortable, the connections are tremendous, it’s one of the nation’s best business programs, and I would be part of the inaugural Vagelos class, meaning I’d be part of a very small group of people graduating in 2010 from this program. A job would, assuming decent performance on my part, be a near guarantee.</p>
<p>Chicago: Definitely a very different school from Penn. Intellectually speaking, it might actually be my best fit. I like it’s Core and the Big Problems curriculum for upperclassmen. One of the nation’s best econ departments, of course. I can do a double major in economics and biochemistry, and still enjoy the opportunity to explore more. I’m also interested in evolutionary psychology and art history, among other things, so I really value the opportunity to explore. However, it costs as much as Penn, and I don’t qualift for aid anywhere. I’m very uninformed as to how much of a difference in getting a job choosing between these two options would make. Socially, it should not be a problem. I’ve heard lots about how the people are slightly off, and that it’s a very nerdy school, but the applicants I know and the people I’ve met on visits have allayed any fears I might have on that count. I think it comes down to the fact that I like Chicago’s classes vs. Penn’s dorms. Since classes are much more important, Chicago wins that round. I guess I need to know how much difference this would make in the job market. In addition, I need some input from people who know Chicago as to whether the “life of the mind” lives up to billing or is just more promotional material.</p>
<p>Stanford: Probably the closest to Chicago in course selections. It’s the only other particularly intellectual school I applied to. Intellectual as opposed to smart. However, I just was not that attracted to it when I visited. But visits, especially during the summer, are misleading, since it wasn’t really in full swing. This would be a strong second option for my parents, especially my dad, who, since he lives in San Jose, adores Stanford. It would also have the added advantage for my family of not having to keep up two houses while also paying for college. However, my parents have showed me their finances, and these expenses are manageable, according to them. In fact, I had to fight to apply to financial safeties, because to them, the money wasn’t even a factor.</p>
<p>Yale: Good social fit, but not a particularly strong econ department, so I can’t think of any compelling reason to go here. I applied more so I would hopefully have a strong school of good social fit, in case some sort of unforeseen disaster occurred with my other applications. It was, in a sense, a reach safety, if that makes any sense.</p>
<p>Princeton: Strong in econ, offers certificates in finance. I’m decently attracted to the place. Certainly not in love with it as I am with Penn and Chicago. It’s also a place I could more easily persuade my parents to let me go. Also, this decision revolves around me deciding where my career lies. If I think it lies in the drug industry, I should go to Penn. But see, I have not even decided if I like economics or business. Yes, they are related, but in business, my forte is finance, not management or entrepreneurship, both of which are in greater emphasis in Vagelos than finance. Also, I’m a bit of a policy wonk at heart, so the opportunity to study at the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton appeals to me.</p>
<p>Duke: Great school, strong in the sciences. My friends there say the orgo courses will be more than sufficient challenge for me. It’s also a good fit for me, in terms of people. Really, I’m very versatile, where people are concerned. Only in two places have I felt that I do not fit in. Unfortunately, in the absence of money, still no compelling reason to attend.</p>
<p>USC: Full tuition. Good option for escaping my parents and attending a strong business school. Definitely a very different courseload from a place like Chicago though, so the same drawbacks mentioned for Wharton apply to USC’s Marshall.</p>
<p>Vandy: Full tuition+2000. A very good social fit. I’ve been in the south for nearly 8 years, and many of my friends are in fact Southern conservatives, even though I’m very liberal. The fact that I’m far from a wild child means that I get along very well with the devout Christians who have a strong presence on campus. Being part of that group would also check any impulse I have to really get into partying or anything else.</p>
<p>UGA: Full ride+3000 a year, coddled for four years and given anything I wanted. But the education, while strong, would not be Ivy League or Chicago strong. Definitely the ultimate escape option. They would also convert my 30K in outside scholarships to cash.</p>