<p>First of all, I agree with previous posters that you are creating some false labeling system/ dichotomy.</p>
<p>There is no “cool crowd” in college. Only people you respect (some who like Star Trek, some who like WoW, some who like football games) - and those you don’t think too highly of (this also cuts across all manner of people). It is not like high school at all.</p>
<p>That being said, of course people will not like you if you have socially repulsive habits. This is not some attempt to “force you to conform” - it’s trying to get you to be able to function in society.</p>
<p>People instinctively will bust on you/ insult you for breaking social norms or having weird social tics sometimes. It’s probably an evolutionary impulse because without such social pressures and ostracization, no one would follow important social norms that probably prevent us from killing each other and working as a team for the greater good.</p>
<p>It’s just like people’s instinctiveness to make fun of fat people, in some vain attempt to get them to stop being fat, regardless of how irrational the logic is.</p>
<p>Similarly, if you’re fly is open, etc., insert weird social tic, people are going to bust on you for it - instinctive impulse.</p>
<p>I also really dislike the whole extrovert/ introvert distinction. Sure, some people are more social than others. But how much of that is learned? How much of that is based on an acquired mindset, attitude, or world view? Indeed, some of it may or may not be genetic.</p>
<p>Sure, researchers have found extraversion to be a component of personality to some extent - but have they studied how changeable it is? And how exactly have they measured “extroversion”? Does their concept of extroversion really have external validity?</p>
<p>Personally, I was certainly born an introvert and continued to be through high school. Now, I’m finding myself to be more and more social, based on several attitude and belief changes.</p>
<p>I think people believe that they are “extroverts” or “introverts” just like they believe that they are a certain sign in the zodiac (which is preposterous) — both categories are cold reads and generalized concepts that can be applied to ANYBODY who believes it is so.</p>
<p>Extroverts: have friends, like socializing, leaving the house (c’mon now)
Introverts: like thinking to themselves, ruminating, having alone time every so often, get nervous in social situations, have some self-doubts and anxieties (this describes EVERYONE).</p>
<p>It’s just like the zodiac and it’s b.s. I think how social you are is based on learned and acquired behaviors and attitudes. At the very least, Introversion to Extraversion is a sliding scale and by no means a dichotomy.</p>
<p>The only annoying part is when someone lables themself as an Introvert (I consider myself more introverted personally) to avoid developing socially or going to talk to girls they want to, etc. It’s like blaming you’re social dysfunction on Asperger’s - a cop out and a dubious diagnosis.</p>
<p>That’s my long rant.</p>