Not sure the point is coming out clearly, so to reiterate: participating in athletics is not a hook for admissions purposes. Being active in an individual or team sport at the same time as maintaining high grades in the most rigorous curriculum available to the student, is appealing to highly selective schools because it shows a student has experience managing multiple obligations, and has demonstrated perseverance, team work, work ethic etc. Sports can demonstrate these skills, but so do many other extra-curricular activities, such as music, science research, service – in this context, sports is just another extra curricular activity.
In contrast, being a recruited athlete is a whole other ballgame. We’ve gone through this for D3 Men’s Soccer, and it’s a game of musical chairs – getting roster spot offers, followed by ED decisions, and then waiting, and trusting, that the coach’s communication about experience with admissions, and about having a spot on the team, holds up. There are other messages on this Board about whether a D3 recruited athlete is “guaranteed” a roster spot. Answer is, it depends on what the coach said and how good their word is. D1 starts and ends sooner, with most D1 men’s players committed by the spring of junior year, and the women are often done by 10th grade. In D1, there are letters of intent, for schools which offer athletic scholarships, and the Ivy League may issue a likely letter from admissions, saying the students is likely admitted. But there is still some trust involved there.
This process is not for the faint of heart, and the feeding frenzy of parents at the NESCAC camps my kid attended was rather unsettling. At the end of the day, the chances of a kid liking a school AND the coach wanting that specific player, are really very small. A kid’s top schools might not be recruiting in his position that year, or the coach might have a style of play which is incompatible with your kid ( roster of players all over 6’1, and your kid is a 5’7 midfielder? Time to move on). The analogy in one of the earlier responses about a choosing an instrument based on the hope that a student will be admitted to Julliard is a good one – the kids who become THAT good, are not just suited for it, they are driven because it is part of them.
So, getting 10 year olds involved in sports for physical and mental health, and to be well-rounded kids who can get along with others – great goal. But do not look for sports based on predictions of where a post-puberty, adolescent body type might be well-suited so that they can be a recruited athlete and thereby be “hooked” for a top school.