@emilybee the CDC did issue guidelines and continues to update them. How would an EO make a difference? There were executive orders in every state requiring people to stay home and that did nothing to stop any of the protests, rioting or looting.
EOs need to have some legal or constitutional basis. You can’t write a brand new law using an EO. And EOs don’t fall within the Supremacy Clause. That applies to laws passed by Congress.
The idea that Governors need the feds to tell them what to do and that they can’t think for themselves, have discussions with the CDC and their own public health officials is ridiculous and amounts to simply passing the buck because they don’t want to take any responsibility for making decisions. For example, after New Orleans held Mardi Gras (because they wanted the money) the mayor and governor complained that the CDC didn’t tell them not to … seriously they couldn’t figure that out? The same thing is happening with colleges. They’re going to open (because they want the money) and it’s going to be a hot mess and they’re going to complain that no one told them not to open.
I want our state Governors to assess what’s happening in their state and the country at large and make informed decisions. They are free to discuss issues with whomever can help them make those decisions. But they don’t get a pass and whine that the federal government isn’t telling them what to do. For example, the Governors of PA, NY, NJ and CT all worked in unison to craft the stay at home orders for those states because of the amount of interstate travel and commerce. They didn’t need the feds to tell them to do it.