<p>"Can you cite proof where these rigged voting machines have been found?</p>
<p>Ditto for the filling out of absentee ballots from someone who is not the voter"</p>
<p>You can’t possibly think that people don’t fill out absentee ballots for people who are deceased or out of town. No one is that naïve. There are all sorts of ways to commit voter fraud.</p>
<p><a href=“Electoral fraud - Wikipedia”>Electoral fraud - Wikipedia;
<p>An example of an election that was turned over because of fraudulent absentee balloting</p>
<p>"William G. Stinson (born circa 1945)[2] is a former Democratic member of the Pennsylvania State Senate. He was elected to represent the 2nd senatorial district in the Pennsylvania Senate in a 1993 special election.</p>
<p>However, Federal District Judge Clarence C. Newcomer declared him the loser of that election after finding that Stinson had engaged in election fraud and ordered Stinson’s Republican opponent, Bruce S. Marks, be seated in his stead. The latter took office on April 28, 1994</p>
<p>The fraud was conducted using absentee ballots, often in the names of deceased people. The decision was notable because it shifted control of the state Senate from the Democratic party to the Republican party. the first time such an event had occurred at the order of a federal judge"
<a href=“William G. Stinson - Wikipedia”>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_G._Stinson</a></p>
<p>Rigged voting machines:</p>
<p>"Tampering with electronic voting machines</p>
<p>All voting systems face threats of some form of electoral fraud. The types of threats that affect voting machines can vary from other forms of voting systems, some threats may be prevented and others introduced. “Threat Analyses & Papers”. National Institute of Standards and Technology. October 7, 2005. Retrieved 5 March 2011.</p>
<p>Some forms of electoral fraud specific to electronic voting machines are listed below. Recent research at Argonne National Laboratories demonstrates that if a malicious actor is able to gain physical access to a voting machine, it can be a simple process to manipulate certain electronic voting machines, such as the Diebold Accuvote TS, by inserting inexpensive, readily available electronic components inside the machine.
Tampering with the software of a voting machine to add malicious code altering vote totals or favor any candidate. Multiple groups have demonstrated this possibility.
Private companies manufacture these machines. Many companies will not allow public access or review of the machines source code, claiming fear of exposing trade secrets.</p>
<p>Tampering with the hardware of the voting machine to alter vote totals or favor any candidate. Some of these machines require a smartcard to activate the machine and vote. However, a fraudulent smart card could attempt to gain access to vote multiple times.</p>
<p>Abusing the administrative access to the machine by election officials might also allow individuals to vote multiple times.
Election results that are sent directly over the internet from a county count center to the state count center can be vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack, where they are diverted to an intermediate web site where the man in the middle flips the votes in favor of a certain candidate and then immediately forwards them on to the state count center. All votes sent over the internet violate chain of custody and hence should be avoided by driving or flying memory cards in locked metal containers from county count centers to the state count center. For purposes of getting quick preliminary state wide results on election night, encrypted votes can be sent over the internet, but final official results should be tabulated the next day only after the actual memory cards arrive in secure metal containers and are counted."</p>