Jimmy Carter: Israeli Apartheid - the liberal view.

<p>MM,</p>

<p>You are somewhat selective in your critical reading. </p>

<p>It was not I who baited the rhetorical hook. I was the quarry for which the hook was intended, even as described by my detractors. As it is, such a uni-bomber–as is so often the case in these stealthy maneuvers–was hoist by his own petard…I simply noted the explosion.

There is a “tremendous difference in world view” in the real world (oops, I’m an adult). That’s how it is. I have family all over the world: Iran, Sweden, Canada, USA…I’m something of a international girl and I simply love hearing different points of view, even ones I’ve never shared or heard before…There are others, of course, prefer the sorts of view that mirror their own. They think they look good in that mirror. They do the ole ‘mirror, mirror on the wall” thing expecting the same ole reply: Beautiful. That’s ok too. Have it your way, as they say. We all want to be happy. Even 19 year olds.</p>

<p>As to the time I spend on the PF, I suppose I should be flattered that you keep track but I do not believe that this is your intention. Some spend the live long day here…I simply breeze in every few days, or weeks while engaged in other academic, social online pursuits (usually research or IMing classmates across the country). </p>

<p>Believe it or not, there are a number of rather well spoken and bright people who post here, I am in contact with quite a few even outside of cc (some are even parents you know here on cc…imagine that, we’ve even socialized–some even quite liberal); I should think most anyone would benefit from an interchange with quite a number of them, they’re good intelligent people (Note: not all of them) with a pov: From 19 year old college students home for the winter to bored middle-aged women in need of stimulating conversation to Bubba-lawyers tearin’ up the world. It’s all good, you see. Enjoy your online day, MM.
Keep me posted.</p>

<p>Cheers </p>

<p>[Not to leave any one out or be a rule violator: “where there is no sun shining”…e.g., the virtual online world–amongst other places]</p>

<p>Now…for the old-man in your life:
<a href=“http://www.sequentialellison.com/gallery/ariel3_c.html[/url]”>http://www.sequentialellison.com/gallery/ariel3_c.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>You love that “hoist by his own petard” phrase, don’t you! ;)</p>

<p>Don’t ever change, FF. I mean that.</p>

<p>Oh, I knew what your French meant, or as they say “pardon my French” which is what they say when they really mean something else! :slight_smile: Just for the benefit of viewers.</p>

<p>And one could make endless rude puns on bomb and bum, etc. but really quite off the subject of the thread, don’t you think?</p>

<p>I too enjoy different points of view, but some so-called adults here stoop to personal attack. As long as you can take it as well as dish it out, enjoy your day online! </p>

<p>(Sorry, didn’t mean you to be a literal child, but at least not yet the parent of a college-age child!) :eek:</p>

<p>A poster in this thread has called for Israel to be “erased”. </p>

<p>….silence from the marmish. </p>

<p>Then, in her defense, some young chick notes that a baiting poster was “hoist by their own petard,” inasmuch as even some other posters felt the ole curmudgeon had launched an inappropriate attack on the young girl that had made an honest effort to comment on the op (which she started) after requests to do so. One even mentioned that

. But such a light defense by a 19 year old girl is an indignity not to be borne by those with serious college age children. </p>

<p>So, to recap:</p>

<p>1) Erasing Israel: silence.</p>

<p>2) Petard: indignity.</p>

<p>…some world.</p>

<p>FS–I was defending Israel’s right to exist before you were born. If I personally responded to every such attack on every such BB, I would not have a life. Can’t speak for others here, but sometimes the arguments get tiresome, and people have their minds made up already anyway.</p>

<p>I was interested in what people had to say about Carter’s book, but it seems that horse has left the stable, never to return.</p>

<p>FS,</p>

<p>Silence? I myself stepped up to him and asked him to explain himself. I think at least a few others did as well. Unless “silence” means “less than passionate uproar,” you have some people on ignore. But as mommusic pointed out, it gets tiring to deal with the Israel-no-more types, and many of us simply don’t bother anymore.</p>

<p>Please, and I mean this in all seriousness, pardon our laziness. But also remember that it’s borne from experience and a tiredness from that experience.</p>

<p>man, oh man</p>

<p>Sounds like y’all could use a little spiked punch right about now ;)</p>

<p>Misterflyer, I partially agree with your logic, that that the Europe, and more specifically the axis countries should have been responsible for helping Israel become a country. And so each shouldered the blame. Lets cast aside Israel’s rght to exist in the Middle East as a Jewish state with a Jewish majority, something granted in 1948, and talk about the axis. First lets look at what the Europeans did to hurt the Jews. The European’s put a quota on Jewish land purchases. The Europeans put a quota on immigrationto Palestine. Especially after 6 million people died, with no place to go, no country to to open its doors, they withered away in refugee camps, with no desire to return to their destroyed homes in their destroyed cities full of people who tried murdering them, they were still not allowed to immigrate to Palestine in large numbers, a right that certainty exised considering there was a Jewish community large enough to sustain these immigrants in a land where the Jews already constituted majority. Eventually, ofcourse the Europeans along with 33 other nations voted to create Israel. But wait, shouldn’t we take into consideration Middle Eastern collaboration with Nazi Germany? According to your logic, those responsible for WWII and the Holocaust should have had to pay the price. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem,Hussieni, the leader of the leading and major Western Palestinian “governmental agency”, much like the Jewish Agency, visited Hitler numerous times. In fact, he told Hitler,“the Muslims inside and outside Plestine welcome the new regime of Germany and hope for the extension of the facist anti-democratic, governmental system to other counties”. In fact, Hussieni, organized a “Nazi Scout” brigade in the stlye of the “Hitler Youth”. Moreover, the SS and Himmler, provided financial and logistical aid for pogroms in Western Palestine (modern day israel). So, as Hitler’s holocaust in Europe was chugging along, so was the Palestinian attempt at Holocaust in Palestine. In fact, that even started much earlier than Hitler’s attempt. In 1929 69 Jews were massacred in Hebron. It might be of interest to you that these Jews were not European immigrants but hundred to thousand year citizens of Palestine. You might be surprised then, Misterlyer, that Hussieni, who if I can remind you again was the leader of the Palestinian Arabs and Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, visited and toured Auschwitz. Unfortunately for you, Hussieni wrote memoirs, which stated:</p>

<p>"Our fundamental condition for cooperating with Germany was a free hand to eradicate every last Jew from Palestine and the Arab world. I asked Hitler for an explicit undertaking to allow us to solve the Jewish problm in a manner befitting our national and racial aspirations and according to the scientific methods innovated by Germany in the hadling of its Jews. The answer I got was:“The Jews are yours”.</p>

<p>World War II, was called a World War for a reason, and in 1944, a German-ARAB commando group, under the command of Hussieni, dropped in Palestine to try to poison Tel Aviv’s wells. Hussieni, the offical leader of Muslims in Palestine, even helpd the pro-nazi coup in Iraq and he organized Muslim commando units in the Bakans called Handselar diviions, which he used to kill Yugoslav Jews.</p>

<p>The Nuremberg trials even declared Husseini a Nazi War Crimminal. </p>

<p>Hussieni, the offical leader of Palestinian muslims, once said this on Berlin radio “Kill the Jews wherever you find them-this pleases God, histoy, and religion”.</p>

<p>In 1948 this war crimminal was elected president of the National Palestinian Council. </p>

<p>So back to your logic, Misterflyer, that the perpaetrators of war and genocide should be held responsible for their deeds, and thus, in your eyes the creation of Israel certaintly met that criteria. </p>

<p>Furthermore, when you made up the number of 6 million Palestinian Arab refugees,(incidentally the number of Jews killed in the holocaust. Makes us think why YOU made up this number) you surely knew that the true number of Arab refugees was 650,000. And you also surely knew that the true number of Jewish refugees from Arab countries was 600,000. (a de facto refugee exchange perhaps?). However, you SURELY, cannot support their return to Israel. Not by your own logic, that is, that the perpatrators of crime and war must shoulder the responsibilities of the war. You mut know that in 1947, after rejecting an Arab state, in an area where the Arabs constituted a majority, 6 Arab armies invaded a country under a British arms embargo, thinking they would crush the young nation. The British, still in Palestine till May of 1948, refused to allow Israel to mobilize an army and import weapons and equipment, even inadvertadely, encouraged this Arab onslaught on Israel. This Arab started war failed. In fact it failed so much, that the Israelis picked up land that was not alloted to them by the UN partition resolution. And this Arab started war even created 650,000 refugees. Should not then the perpatrators of this war shoulder the responsibility of the Arab refugees the same way that Europe should have shouldered the responsibility of Jewish refugees post-holocaust? Misterflyer, looks like you have been caught in your own logic. On one hand, it became evident tha the Arabs were partially responsible for the Nazi crimes and thus, according to YOUR logic, should be forced to also deal with the problem. On the other hand, it became evident that the Arab nations are responsible for the Arab refugee problem, and that THEY, not Israel, according to your logic that is, should have to deal with those Arabs.</p>

<p>As for why the Jews deserved a country in Palestine, with out referencing religion, history, and facts on the ground? Well, the Jews moved to a barren and economically worthless wasteland, displacing practically no one, they moved to a land where the people, as small in numbers as they were, had no nationalistic aspirations, in fact they had no real infrastructure. After building a viable sustaining community, the Jews constituted an ethnic and nationalistic majority in an area completely apart from the Arab rot surrounding the Jewish cities. Thus they had their case for statehood.</p>

<p>But people are different, Misterflyer. You and I may not meet eye-to-eye on this, but it is okay. No matter how many times you and Ahmidenijad espouse the same opinions on how to deal with Israel, Israel will still be a country. No matter, how many times the Arabs wage war on Israel, Israel will still be a country, and no matter, how many suicide bombers blow up babies, Israel will still be a country.</p>

<p>But I would really like to discuss Jimmy Carter’s book. On page 3 of this thread I made some points about it. If anyone would like to discuss them, please, it hould be interesting.</p>

<p>cite your facts. I want links for some of the stuff you said, which I believe are either A. false or B. distorted.
Just like in the previous long post were you failed to mention that both sides rejected the Peel Commission.</p>

<p>misterflyer,</p>

<p>Just out of curiousity, how does the equally awful treatment of Palestinians by Jordan and other Arab nations sit with you? I’m not trying to be a smartalec, and am genuinely curious.</p>

<p>Actually Jordan is one of the few Arabic countries that grant Palestinians full rights. However, other Arabic countries do not. However, one has to understand that some of the other Arabic countries are poor and cannot absorb such a large population. Referring to allmusic’s post from before she stated the Zionists receives 3 billion a year and Egypt receives 2 billion a year. So Egypt gets 2/3 of the aid and is 12 TIMES the size of Israel. That would make them obviously limited in what they can do.</p>

<p>Actually Jordan is one of the few Arabic countries that grant Palestinians full rights. However, other Arabic countries do not. However, one has to understand that some of the other Arabic countries are poor and cannot absorb such a large population. Referring to allmusic’s post from before she stated the Zionists receives 3 billion a year and Egypt receives 2 billion a year. So Egypt gets 2/3 of the aid and is 12 TIMES the size of Israel. That would make them obviously limited in what they can do. so per capita Israel receives 18 times as much aid.</p>

<p>Referring to the previous discussion about populations and displacement here are some statistics from Wikipedia (neutral site) and Jewish Virtual Library (you know that Anti-Semitic bastion). Note I took a neutral site and an Israeli-backing site, I took no pro-Palestinian site into account.</p>

<p>From the JVL , <a href=“http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/yishuv.html[/url]”>http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/yishuv.html&lt;/a&gt;
It shows 1881: Arabs: 470,000 Jews: 24,000
1914: Arabs:500,000 Jews: 85,000</p>

<pre><code> Note that the original Palestinian Jewish was extremely small. Zionism’s immigration began in 1881 and while Arab population remained constant jewish population increased 4-fold.
</code></pre>

<p>By 1922 , here is what Wikipedia tells us, reprinted below <a href=“Mandate for Palestine - Wikipedia”>Mandate for Palestine - Wikipedia;

<p>Year Total Muslim Jewish Christian Other
1922 752,048 589,177(78%) 83,790(11%) 71,464(10%) 7,617(1%)
1931 1,036,339 761,922(74%) 175,138(17%) 89,134(9%) 10,145(1%)
1945 1,764,520 1,061,270(60%) 553,600(31%) 135,550(8%) 14,100(1%)</p>

<pre><code>Both numbers tell us two important things.
Unless the 22,000 original Jewish inhabitants had an amazing birthrate 90-95 percent of the inhabitants at 1945 were European and Russian Jewish immigrants. The original Jewish (indigenious) population was minuscule.
</code></pre>

<p>This immigration at the end of the Holocaust was as large as it was illegal. I am merely trying to correct previous wrongs. Let’s not even get into the fact that alhough Jews only were 1/3 of the pop. they got 2/3 of the land. And they only owned 12 percent of the land. This paragraph here is irrelevant because I don’t believe in a Zionist entity, let alone the size.</p>

<p>misterflyer–Yes, some of the other Arab countries are poor. Some of them are so oil-rich they could have singlehandedly rebuilt the Palestinian entity and made it a stable and prosperous nation. If they had wanted to. If it were not better for their purposes to leave it to fester next to Israel.</p>

<p>Of course, if you don’t believe the Zionist entity should exist, it’s hard to have a discussion here.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>With a new wrong. And you know what they say about two wrongs. And they certainly ain’t makin’ a right at this Albuquerque. </p>

<p>Besides, according to whom was it “illegal”? This seems like one of those impossibly vague statements bandied about in an attempt to put a negative spin on something that is actually largely amoral. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>And why shouldn’t Jews, a people who’ve long been oppressed and treated like garbage around the world, be given the right to self-determination? </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Yes, Jordan has been generally good. But they’ve also recently been less-than-generous toward incoming Palestinians. Granted, it was King Hussein who said, “Since 1948 Arab leaders have approached the Palestine problem in an irresponsible manner. . . . They have used the Palestine people for selfish political purposes. This is ridiculous and, I could say, even criminal.”</p>

<p>The way I see this, the Arab countries are just as guilty as Israel, but I don’t see you really jumping up and down about the Arab League’s maltreatment of Arabs.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Correction: The populations of many Arab states are poor. The leadership, however, is usually pampered to the point of absurdity, giving the American billionaire a run for his money. It’s amazing how quickly the Saudi Royal Family will declare Israel an abomination, but won’t do squat to help the Palestinians.</p>

<p>Which facts do you contend, Misterflyer. Tell me and I will cite sources for all of them. </p>

<p>So the Jordanians treat the Palestiians well. I see. Black September does not mean anything to you?</p>

<p>And also, misterflyer, since you seemed handy with the figures of US aid for Israel and Arab nations. Do youknow where I can find the EU, Russian, and previously Soveit aid figures to Israle and/or Arab countries.</p>

<p>And my offer on citing sources still stands. Whatever facts you contend I will cite and maybe then we can discuss what I mentioned in that long post on page 6.</p>

<p>The Arab nations keep the Palestinians under their thumbs purposefully. They have left their brothers in refugee camps, refused to take them into their own countries, and basically used the Palestinians as political pawns. </p>

<p>Not one of these nations cares a whit about the Palestinians, but it is definitely easier to blame Israel for every national issue in the ME than for the people to look internally and see that their brutal regimes are the source of their own problems.</p>

<p>O Misterflyer, to adress your post #53. The land allotted to Israel in partition had a Jewish majority. That is a fact.</p>

<p>Second of all, to say that Israel had more land, is ver misleading. The Negev, a barren wildreness, at the time, was worth economically, politically practically nothing. Furthermore, the Jews established a viable, sustaining, infrastructure, the Arabs had not. They would not be able to hold their own afer independance, despite probable foreign aid they would have recieved. So if you added to the territory they controlled, it would make matters worse. But I do not even want to discuss this, beause the facts are so obvious. To me it is more interesting to talk about the Arab refugee problem and Israel’s right to exist. Maybe even Carter’s book…if anyone still cares about that.</p>

<p>The Palestinian Arab refugee problem was started by the Arab nations themselves. They took the issue upon themselves when they invaded Israel and started war.</p>

<p>Between 1948 and 1967, the Arab did barely anything to integrate the Palestinians int their society. Before the total radicilization of the Palestinian Arab movement, Jordan, did try with some sucesses to move them out of refugee camps and create for them jobs and the such. Contrast that with what Egypt did in Gaza and you will realize why the Gazans were always more militant than those Arabs in the West Bank. Egypt did next to nothing for their Arab brethren. They allowed them to wallow and rot in their refugee camps. On top of that, for political reasons and for the reasons of destroying Israel, Gaza became a hot launching off point for raids into Israel. Encouraged by the Egyptian populace and organized by the government and army, Palestinian Arabs were used as fedayeens to attack Israel in short raids, often taking the form of killing Israeli civillians in the Western Negev. The UN as another failure for the refugees. UNRWA did nothing productive to alleviate their problems. They even made them worse by allowing intense anti-Western and anti-Israeli propogando to be taught in the UN schools, a tradition that still exists today with UN textbooks glorifying terrorists and showing Israel as a country called Palestine.</p>

<p>Again, contrast the treatment of refugees by Egypt to the treatment of refugees by Israel. After Israel’s independence, 600,000 Jews escaped to Israel and themselves were initially housed in refugee camps and abandoned Arab homes. However, the Israeli government did alot to integrate them into society. Granted, there were many problems with the Israeli government, controlled by European Jews and these new Oriental Jews, but they were put into cities, into schools, given jobs etc and now they are a thriving community. </p>

<p>The plight of the Palestinian Arabs is something that concerns me. It is so unfortunate that they have been essentially used as a proxy by the Arab governments to destroy Israel. It is even more unfortunate that they to date have not had a responsible leader or government. Unfortunately, Abbas, who is a possible partner for peace, is too weak to get anything done. On the other hand, Hamas is a terrorist, populist government, who, unfortunately must be starved, until it makes the first steps for peace. Ever since the disengagment from Gaza, the onus has been on the Palestinian Arabs, and they have failed. I realize Israel’s concerns for peace and security and they right now are not in a position to be make more unilateral gestures of peace. It is not right nor will it bring true peace. Israel has to keep fighting, and when a partner for peace emerges, much like Sadat emerged in Egypt, Israel must jump at the opportunity to create a viable Palestinian Arab state in Gaza and parts of Judea and Samaria. </p>

<p>By my posts, it can by easily discenred that I am pro-Israeli. Those who say that are right. However, I am also pro-Palestinian, and I wish there to be a two-state solution. This distinguishes me from many who consider themselves pro-Palestinians yet they are anti-Israeli (see misterflyer).</p>

<p>I would like everyone to notice and understand the mindset of someone like Misterflyer, who feels Israel has no right to exist. He covers his pure hate up, by an attempt at logic that Europe should be responsible for Jews and Israel, however, when faced with the facts of Arab complicity with the Nazis and the real cause of the Arab refgee problem, misterflyer comes to deny those very basic facts. This reveals the ignorance of someone who is anti-Israeli, anti-semitic, or for that matter, anti-Palestinian, they are ignorant and unwilling to see the truth. So if anyone, misterflyer or Allmusic or whoever, wishes to contend the facts I presented to countrer misterflyer’s argument, I would be more than happy to give you all sources.</p>

<p>In response to Ari, of course some Arab countries do not grant full rights to the Palestinian populations and use these people as pawns. When did I say contrary? You and Mauser, excuse me for the critique, use the same technique. You assume I said something that I did not , and then you argue against it and think you won the argument. You like spend 2 lines of your post on what I wrote and the rest on stuff I haven’t even discussed.
As it stands from before, the only rebuttal Ari gave is something about Jews deserving their own country because of discrimination. I would like to point out that neither Gypsies nor African-Americans in the USA ( I really don’t consider Liberia an adequate sol’n), nor Native Americans, nor Kurds were given such an accord and their histories were as miserable if it not more miserable. However, even if I cede that point I have already fairly pointed out how 95 percent of the immigration coming into what was then known as Palestine were Jews displaced from Europe and Russia. So let them give up their lands, the Arabs have no responsibility for those people and should give them no mercy.
The Arab Jews were only expelled as a result of the creation of Israel, so that discussion is ex post facto. And keep in mind that many of the Jews left willingly and that in Iraq, as documented by ISRAELI sources, I can pull them from Wikipedia later if you please, attacked Jews themselves to force immigration into Israel. Also, there was the Lavon Affair, which I doubt you ever learned about.
The difference between my arguments and those of Ari, AllMusic, and Mauser are simple. I have no ethnic or religious connection to the land, but am merely an observer who has studied the history and the politics. However, even though I nothing about this trio, I can probably guess correctly that all three of you are Jewish and support Israel on that reason alone. Therefore, arguments are futile because your support comes out of the irrational (religion) and a sense of identity. Not any kind of studying the facts. It’s no different from when I see neo-Cons spout talking points they hear from talk radio, ironically Allmusic will be the first to jump on their throats for the same thing.
To further expand upon the previous point, support for Israel in this day and age comes almost exclusively from Jews and America. Speakers as various as the EU, Nelson Mandela, and Gandhi have all condemned the Israeli state. Hundreds of UN Sec. Council resolutions have not been passed because of 1 veto. You guessed it. I believe that regardless of whether it be willing or forced, the days of Israel are numbered. If forced, the end may not be pretty it may end with the 2nd Holocaust as many Palestinians are so resentful of the Zionist presence that the Zionists will be driven to the sea. I do not wish that to happen. I believe if there is an absorption of the European Jews and Arab Jews into the West and the Arabic countries respectively, with compensation of course, would be the most feasible solution. I remember from AP English, that I believe Thoreau noted that he believed the solution to the slave issue would have been that the slave-owners would be all compensated for giving up the slaves. It wasn’t given any thought, but I am sure at the end of the war it seemed the best solution.</p>