<p>well if you want to go like to another place NYU (New York University) is great i’ve heard.</p>
<p>lolz and I never have to do major exams (beside Sat’s and IB tests next year)</p>
<p>ACT, IB Exams What up!</p>
<p>Hey MIT.</p>
<p>You’re trying the act now instead of the SAT?
Tell me how that goes.</p>
<p>ahhhh it’s friday!!!
I can sleep in at long last!!</p>
<p>Woeishe- this is a JUNIORS thread</p>
<p>Idk if I posted it here, but here’s my testing schedule:</p>
<p>April 9- ACT
May 4- AP Calc Test
May 6- AP APUSH Test
May 7- SAT I
May 11- AP Statistics Test
June 4- SAT II
June 21-24: Six midterms
September- SAT I (maybe)
October- SAT II</p>
<p><.<
My teting sched is simply a SAT in May…(I think it’s may?) and in June as well as in Sept</p>
<p>IB testing end of senior year (getting ready to get a 1 in Latin -_____<em>- but like a 6 or 7 in english ^</em>^ and art)
umm… yah that’s it.</p>
<p>I took both last year.</p>
<p>1830 and a 30…</p>
<p>I have to pick.</p>
<p>So the ACT seems easier to you?</p>
<p>i’m sticking with the SAT. I’ve been studying for it so I feel like I should at least break my old score.
I’m aiming for a <2000
Lolz perhaps i’m nothing more than a dreamer :)</p>
<p>my SAT goal >= 2100
ACT goal- 32</p>
<p><2000?</p>
<p>lol that’s 100% success rate there.</p>
<p>If I studied… a 36 on the ACT would be easy.</p>
<p>2400 would be too.</p>
<p>what do you mean 100% success rate?
2400 is the highest. If I get a 2000 or above it means that I got a few wrong.</p>
<p>I doubt that it would be as easy as you make it sound.
Some people work their butt off and bever break 1500</p>
<p>You said <2000</p>
<p>That’s less than 2000.</p>
<p>black- you said you want at MOST a 2000. anyone could do that. you could get a 200 and still meet your goal. </p>
<p>i think you meant to say around 2000</p>
<p>Yah that’s what i wanted lolz.
I meant to say that is my min.
I’m so tired my thoughts are not even getting across the right way.</p>
<p>and @MIT if I say X>Y
then i am saying that x is greater than y, right?
my math teacher has aways said the “monster (a.k.a the open part) is eating the “bigger animal” (aka the X) and is leaving alone the 'small animal” (aka the Y). Is that wrong?</p>
<p>my math skills are horrid. -____-</p>
<p>i was taught that > is a pac man or an alligator, and it’s pointing away from the smaller number because it wants to eat the bigger one</p>
<p>@Black yes lol.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>That’s what you said lol.</p>
<p>I wasn’t taught a method. It just became natural at a certain point.</p>
<p>ahhh thanks CPU and MIT
so it would be 2000<</p>
<p>This might be why I did so badly on the math section.</p>
<p>Studying time lol.</p>
<p>Essay on the Mexican abandonment of the goals of the revolution.</p>
<p>He wants until 1920… which is poor… so to WW2 I go.</p>
<p>I have to do a project where I interview people from WWII and I make a movie. It’s fun so far.</p>
<p>black: you mean you want >2000 (in words it would be “greater than 2000”.)
what you put, 2000< it’s basically saying “2000 less than”…less than what? lol get your math straight girl!</p>
<p>ahhh i have no homework. for now :)</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>My math skills are bad! I know!</p>