<p>
</p>
<p>You’re right. But you at the same time are just not getting it. I’m not talking about “devout Christians.” I’m talking about people with principles so strong, regardless of what they are, that breaking them is literally an impossibility for all practical purposes.</p>
<p>So consider the following statement:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Does that sound like a reasonable thing to say? Not really.</p>
<p>So let me make this clear to you: I know my family. I know my friends. I know their beliefs. I know their personalities. I’m sure you know those around you as well.</p>
<p>In terms of likelihood, I am absolutely not kidding when I say these kids/parents would no more kill someone then sleep with them. Again, it’s a matter of framework, so I suggest you shed your blinders and stop being so hidebound, and realize that the lens through which you are seeing the issue is simply a manifestation of your own views and experiences.</p>
<p>I don’t delude myself into thinking that everyone who says that they are going to be virgins until marriage will be – obviously, that is false. But you in turn need to realize that if the conviction is strong enough, it will prevail. That’s why we don’t have murders left and right.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>That’s what people told my parents. Turned out they just became less flexible, if you want to put it that way, and more convinced of their own ideology, i.e. they become more extreme and devoted to the belief system that they had previously held. That’s what people have told me would happen in middle school. And high school. And college. My moral beliefs and ethical beliefs have changed…never (really not kidding here). Nor will they. Look at Pope Benedict XVI, for example, and tell me that he has become more flexible over time, what with his explicit statement that interreligious dialogue is impossible, reaffirming the ban on contraception, etc. I’m still really struggling to understand how someone could be so arrogant as to claim to know the belief systems and future developments thereof of people they have not met.</p>
<p>Again, I’m not claiming to know everyone. But I do know myself pretty well. And my beliefs stem from something so deep that if you do not embrace, you cannot possibly fathom its implications (i.e., religion). So, yes, it really is that simple – I believe X, and I will always believe X. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Clearly not. She should deal with it. But her daughter is already on BC. She should talk to her daughter about her views on sex, which I mentioned in a previous post that was lost with all the posts explaining that I clearly don’t know my relatives at all. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I expanded it beyond that – when you feel the need to lash out at someone, do you always do it? I highly doubt it. Why not? Because you are in control. It’s the exact same principle relating to sex. In fact, one could argue that sex is in a way always premeditated, so the “biological need” is not actually that relevant unless two people spontaneously become naked and then have to decide whether or not to have sex. What I’m saying is that I and people I know don’t put themselves in situations where sex is even a possibility, e.g. being in a very private place with someone of the opposite sex (or same sex if they are gay). The point is that the principle is so strong that it prevails.</p>
<p>People don’t live up to their own standards, sure. People make mistakes, sure. But people don’t always make big mistakes. If having premarital sex is a big enough mistake, then you won’t do it. Period. </p>
<p>It isn’t that hard to understand.</p>