<p>I’ve been on CC a long time–I’m also surprised at the number of more conservative views expressed on this particular thread. I think it is just an anomaly–a couple weeks ago I was “attacked” for expressing the same view (“No unmarried romantic partners staying in my home.”) </p>
<p>From the article: "But the greater dividend of his stay was that it gave Ms. Collinss three younger adolescent children a view of committed love that far surpassed most of what they had seen from adults. Ms. Collins said, I hope they wont settle for less. "</p>
<p>I’m surprised at this–makes my head spin, tbh. The fact that I still have several younger children in the house is one of the main reasons that I would NOT want the older ones BFs/GFs sleeping over/moving in. I think it is a bad example. (A couple years later, “But MOM, you let Sister’s BF move in. . .why not MINE?” Mom: “That was different, she was 17, you’re only 16. And her BF was nice. Yours is an addict.”)</p>
<p>IMO the relationship mentioned in the article (allowing high school boyfriend to move in with the family) is not really an example of “committed love.” It is just “playing house” while mom pays the bills. The “success” of this relationship is dependent on one thing: effective birth control. What would happen if the daughter got pregnant in this situation?
(This happened to my cousin’s D, whose mom allowed the BF to move in. The mom had relationship/sexual “issues” herself–which makes me suspicious of any parent who would encourage this. In fact, I wonder where “MR. Collins”, the girl’s dad, was in all this decision making? I say this because my cousin’s (ex) wife was a single mother. I think a DAD would be much less likely to allow his high school D to sleep with her BF in his house. The fact that Ms. Collins suggests that her kids haven’t seen loving/committed relationships among the adults in their lives makes me wonder if she herself is divorced/has relationship issues, and is living vicariously through her D. I admit that all this is pure speculation about the Collins family, but because of what happened with my cousin’s D, I noticed this and it makes me wonder if the same type of thing is going on.) In the end, the young couple in the article were so committed that they decided to go to different colleges.</p>
<p>There is a big difference between an engaged couple, who are out of college, working, wedding date set, etc. and a couple of high school kids. Pregnancy happens. For a high school couple, that would be a much bigger issue than for an older, engaged couple. Not committed enough to have/raise a child together? Not committed enough for sex, imo.</p>
<p>I wonder if some of the polarization of opinions on this is geographic? (Obviously there are religious and social differences, too.) Where I live (midwest, conservative suburb) I can’t even imagine any sane, decent, parents who would allow/approve/encourage this (high schoolers moving in).</p>