<p>Arabrab, what a great list! DTE, sending you and your friend the light.
Oregon, totally cool that your brother is opening up.</p>
<p>And Shaw, re getting complete, I’ll try to explain what it means. It sounds basically similar to what Oregon has already done, but since I know you’re interested in transformative consciousness I’ll take a stab at illustrating the landmark tools.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Shaw, in theory, “getting complete” doesn’t require anything on the part of the other person, so they can be clinically narcissistic all they want. And people don’t have to like each other or love each other, except possibly as fellow humans, when its done.</p>
<p>I’ll try to give an authentic example: my mother was not able to protect us as children from a violent alcoholic; she herself was victimized, but also pretty attached to her gilded cage, if you will, and too terrified or demoralized to make a new life for us. The night she left my father, it was because 8-year-old me had knocked him over the head, called the police, climbed out a second story window, inserted myself into the arriving police car, and attempted to convince the cop that my mother and sister would never be safe and that this time they really had to leave. The cop finally divined the magnitude of the problem, and talked her into leaving. My circumstances gave rise to and amplified my natural bossiness with both my sister and mother, who from an early age, I viewed to be mewling victim types.</p>
<p>Over the years, this was only reinforced by the vissitudes of single parenthood. The effect on my sister from my domineering behavior gave rise to her stuttering, among other issues. I also never gave my mother much of a chance to actually mother me, because I didn’t trust her competence.</p>
<p>Later, when she remarried and had two more children, I ensconced myself as nanny, housekeeper, and head disciplinarian - some might say it was warranted, others might view it to be a power-grab. I’d say it was both depending on the lense you’re wearing… When I went away to school, the youngest girls were devastated, and one (who has learning disabilities) was lost without structure or tutelage. Years later, she ran away, I intervened, and she lived with me.</p>
<p>Getting complete with my mother, years later, wasn’t about a laundry list of her failures to me or ammends for what i might have deemed to be an ineffective way of being – none of that mattered. It was about the ways I capitalized on those failures to continue running a game that might be called “power over” if you’re fond of Neitzche. My “story” inside my head - deep down below the surface – was that no one would look after me, no one had my
back. Getting complete meant simply recognizing that while she was running a victim/incompetence/fear game I was running a “power over” game that locked up the dynamic and affected our respective roles in my family. So I fired myself as the stand-in parent and gave her permission to be not only my mother, but the mother of the rest of the children. I expressed that I wanted an authentic relationship.</p>
<p>The miracle of this kind of work is that when you change your lense, what you call to yourself also shifts. While I am completely okay with my own tendency to “power over” I am now also free to “feel safe” without it. While giving my mother permission to mother me sounds silly, that one small utterance really did shift the dynamic and gave us enjoyment inside our relationship. More importantly, she really has taken on a different role with my sisters, now that there’s a little “room” to do so.</p>
<p>So, getting complete is sort of one part dual forgiveness (forgiving yourself without rationalizing it; forgiving the other person from a “universe is perfect” lense without being a historical revisionist…eg, it was what it was, void of dramatic energy) plus a teensy bit of transactional analysis plus a teensy bit of eastern philosophy in the “recognizing the illusory nature of the reality” we co-create in worldly situations, and just deciding who to be about it all. Freeing oneself from our own deteministic stories about ourselves and the whys and taking that power and energy and using it differently. Transforming our relationship to events that shaped us so that the latent story or racket doesn’t run the rest of our lives (unless we CHOOSE it ;))</p>
<p>The difference in the training (compared with therapy or Judeo-Christian forms of forgiveness and making amends) is that with lm, the other human has to hear you
not necessarily understand you, just physically hear you.</p>
<p>I don’t know if I’ve done the topic any justice, but I find it an interesting subject.</p>