<p>^ true. :)</p>
<p>Usually is a 77.</p>
<p>so what’s the consensus so far? i think most people think its casual attitude/application from before</p>
<p>actually i believe it was “casual approach”, and that’s what i got.</p>
<p>I have fever (102F) for 2 days, and crawled into classroom this morning …</p>
<p>It’s hard to get perfect score of PSAT, I’m praying…</p>
<p>just checking: a^b=64. how many choices?</p>
<p>a^b=64 four choices</p>
<p>2^6, 4^3, 8^2, 64^1</p>
<p>^ four</p>
<p>2^6
4^3
8^2
64^1</p>
<p>^good. is the psat usually this easy? i remember it being much harder last year, but it could have been that practice psat packet =p. any1 take it 3 times?</p>
<p>^ 4.
EDIT: Whoops, haven’t taken the PSAT 4 times lolll…was answering your previous Q.</p>
<p>
I’m sorry you’re not feeling well. But just know that you do NOT need a perfect score! You only need to pass your state’s threshold for Nat’l Merit Semifinalist status, if that’s what you’re aiming for. Colleges don’t see your PSAT score.</p>
<p>oh yeah and what were the choices for the one about gulping sherry wine? idr casual as an answer</p>
<p>any1 remember the work for the “99-1000” question? </p>
<p>it was 171 right?</p>
<p>^^pheochromacytoma, you’re right sorry. Yes, I’m pretty sure it was the casual (approach) option. I could be wrong, but I think that’s the general consensus as well. Thoughts?</p>
<p>And did we ever come to a conclusion on the strike question? I’m fairly sure I picked the wrong answer (the shorter one)…but I’m still not quite sure why it is wrong. :/</p>
<p>^^what was the question?</p>
<p>college i have it posted on pg 30</p>
<p>^^theres only two possible answers ive seen so far. casual and the one you said. do you happen to remember the others?</p>
<p>how was the corn problem $2.50?
the $1 can was 28 ounces, the $.75 can was like 16, and the $.5 can was 10
you need at least 60 ounces for the recipe. multiply three for $1 can (two cans would only get you 56 ounces), multiply four for $.75 can (three cans would only yield 48 ounces), and multiply six for the $.5 can (for perfect 60 ounces)
all of those produce $3.00 total. so shouldn’t the the least costly brand still be $3.00 regardless?</p>
<p>You could do it two ways:</p>
<p>2x$1=$2 (56 oz.)
+</p>
<h1>1x$.50=$.50 (10 oz.)</h1>
<p>$2.50 (66 oz.)</p>
<p>OR</p>
<p>1x$1=$1 (28 oz.)
+</p>
<h1>2x$.75=$1.50 (32 oz.)</h1>
<p>$2.50 (60 oz.)</p>
<p>you can have 2 of the 28 ounce, 1 of the 10 ounce. $1 + $1 + $.5 = $2.5</p>
<p>^^thats the maximum, the question said “at least enough” with minimum price underlined. </p>
<p>so $2 = 56 oz + .5= 2.50</p>