<p>@tall I agree with you on “had depicted” q. nice explanaton</p>
<p>@loljk can you elaborate on that TV q, I vaguely remember it…and I too would like to know the mantle Q. I put appearance</p>
<p>same for that reason is so awky</p>
<p>@jkang909: wasn’t it 1050?
because it was basically looking for (x+y)^2 and it gave you x^2 +y^2, and xy.
so you had to add the two together, and it was like 1050.</p>
<p>it was like talking about how kids comprehend reading and the measure of sentences or something. and i thought it was either determine the meaning or establish the validity</p>
<p>For the passage on india. What was the girl’s attitude question?</p>
<p>@jkang I thought it was leave the same. pretty sure this was discussed before in this thread and consensus was it is same. it was proving colorful example of a fact. don’t just want to state fact after fact etc. and it was very pertinent to the sentence before it.</p>
<p>@siemprell For Mozart, I think I made a change to it although I can’t remember what it was. For some reason letter E is hitting me but all I remember is I made a change, something so the writers that wrote about him used the parts that supported their theory etc.</p>
<p>@Siemprell The question was referring to the tv/reading passage and asked what the meaning of “literary analysis” is based on the passage. I put the meaning, but I’ve heard people say it was skepticism?</p>
<p>it 1350, it said xy=300 and x^2 + y^2 = 750 and you were looking for (x+y)^2 </p>
<p>so factor out into x^2 + 2xy+ y^2 and plug in 300 for xy
and get x^2 + 600 + y^2 and then plug in 750 for
x^2+y^2 and get 600 +750 = 1350</p>
<p>i put that literary attitude was something with skepticism.</p>
<p>@jkang909 Well. It wouldn’t make sense then to say only the female research but not male.</p>
<p>@itzChewy: dam, your right. how did i miss the 2xy D:</p>
<p>definitely skepticism because the author implies that people should not agree with everything they read and be able to discern and be “skeptical” of the truth in what they read.</p>
<p>in the female male question you do not delete the results of the male research because it listed the results of the female research too</p>
<p>CR - 4 to 6 wrong, 1 omitted
M - 0 to 2 wrong
W - 2 to 4 wrong</p>
<p>Score predictions? I’m hoping to break the 200 mark…</p>
<p>its ok dkimo96 i changed so many answers and they were right before -______________-</p>
<p>idk i thought it interrupted the flow from male to female research results but i guess i read it too fast</p>
<p>@andrew, for mozart one. The last one got eliminated by me because it used semicolon and said by selecting and… as a dependent clause. If i remember correctly, sentences joined by semi colon should be able to stand on its own?</p>
<p>jacobjay i would say </p>
<p>CR: 68-72
M: 74-80
W: 66-72</p>
<p>@loljk exactly. I agree with skepticism</p>
<p>@iTzChewy, thank you! Hopefully my estimations are correct, haha.</p>