<p>I know two young women who are both the main bread winners by far in their families. Both have what are considered prized jobs, and yes, they do love working. But the fact of the matter is that for them to have babies is that it is THEIR bodies, not the males’ that will be the hosts. THEIR hormones will be affected If they want to nurse, and they both do, the milk comes from THEIR breasts, and it 's not always that easy to pump enough when one works a full time job. </p>
<p>I don’t think that it is just the physical that is affected when having children, and a woman’s body does include the brain and hormones that will also dictate how one feels about giving up the children to others’ care. Not as much for some as others–I certainly agree that being female and a mother is not an automatic for being a great caretaker for children, but I think if one makes the talley between the sexes, the numbers will come out a lot higher for the females by quite a bit. </p>
<p>It pains both the women involved that they have to leave their kids for 50+ hours a week to the care of others. Their husbands? They don’t care as much. They’d happily leave them for more. Yes, they love their kids, but it’s not as high of a priority for them. Anecdotal, yes, but I think it is more typical than not. It’s difficult to beat the biology, and the fact of the matter is that women do carry that chlld and it’a long time that child is a part of a woman. Cutting the cord is just one physical break. The rest do not come as easily.</p>
<p>Most independently wealthy families, by the way, do hire caretakers and baby sitters for their children. I know a number of them, and not a one spends the time I did with my kids. </p>
<p>As Zoosermom’s post shows, her working all of these years is not necessarily going to mean she’s going to have a great career to retirement. Job fields have undergone a lot of changes, and anyone who has put the time in an area that is cutting back drasticly has a high chance of being under or unemployed. Throw in a divorce and yes, such a person will be in trouble. The math teacher, the nurse, doctor, health care professional is far more likely to find work with some refresher courses even taking a 20 year hiatus from the job because the demand is there in that field. </p>
<p>As for the heat being on the working mother more than the working father, it’s simply a matter of numbers. You see far more working fathers. They are the norm. Not unusual at all. The working mothers are fewer in number, though more than in earlier years, and I’m seeing more non working fathers as the other parent than I ever did before. It used to be both parents working when there was a working mom, and it was very clear that in such situations, the father was the one with more emphasis on work. For many years, I’ d make calls to parents or talk to them about upcoing things, and when it’s the dad, because I never presumed that it had to be the mom I directed this ino, more times than not, he’d tell me to tell his wife because she took care of those things. Didn’t even want to know about it, just tell the mom. I’ve never, never in 30 years of dealing with this, gotten that response from a mother. So it’s the way things actually have been.</p>
<p>Are they changing? Somewhat. But from seeing my friends’ kids who are married now embarking on parenthood, many with full time career moms in the pictures, again, those moms, even as the one making the most money with the job that needs the most time, are taking the lion’s share of the parenting.</p>
<p>My brother is a SAHD, and though he is involved as much as any dad I’ve known and more than most he is not up there, not even average among the SAHMs I’ve known. Not all his doing, as he is often left out in the kitchen klatches and get together among the moms, since he’s one of very few dads who are truly SAH in his community. He will tell you right out, that even with moms working full time, they tend to be more involved with their kids than the dads in the picture.</p>