<p>Using a rough analogy, getting out of a marriage is like a physics statics problems, where you have some combination of forces on an object and what happens depends on which way the forces sum up to go. So if the forces that indicate divorce outweight staying, it is probably better to divorce.</p>
<p>The problem with the analogy is there is nothing simple as a physics problem here, a lot of the ‘forces’ are difficult to resolve or figure out, it is why working things through is important, because often you don’t know even where to begin summing things up to decide, and then you need to be able to look at how to handle whatever the decision is, whether it is to remain or not, on for example figure out the consequences of divorce. </p>
<p>In terms of why divorce became more common, another poster hit the nail on the head, it was because it became a lot easier to divorce, not only did the laws change to allow people to more easily divorce or divorce at all, but also it had to do with women not being forced to stay because their opportunities were so limited. By the 60’s and 70’s a lot more women who got married had had lives outside their family, they had gone to college or had job skills and because of the changes in discrimination law, women started having opportunities at a variety of professions, not just the secretary and teacher of prior generations, and when they married, they had had the opportunity to date and see what the world was, and more importantly, to feel if they got married they could support themselves if it didn’t work out. </p>
<p>On the other hand, I think the pendulum swung too far the other way, I think people because they could simply when things got rough said “see ya” in far too many numbers, rather then try and make things work. Someone I know who is a therapist who is skilled with issues of sexuality and relationships had done some work on people who live in alternate relationships, people into poly relationships, dom/sub relationships and so forth, and one of the things she said was that people in ‘regular’ marriages could learn a lot, that those kind of relationships require all kinds of negotiating and navigation skills to even start let alone work for any length of time and the people in them know that and expect to work, whereas many people in regular marriages kind of expect to let it ‘flow’, find their soulmate and everything will be going downhill, and it isn’t, it takes work to keep people happy as time goes on. She said that when the floodgates opened on divorce, people who didn’t have the skillset to negotiate their relationship, to get what they needed, saw divorce as the only option.</p>
<p>I read something recently that was interesting was that the children of divorce from the era when it became common (1970’s, 80’s) themselves are showing major reluctance to get divorced, and that in some ways the stigma of being divorced is greater then it has been in a long while among them (I think the article was in the NY Times). One of the big differences is younger generations are getting married later, so it could be that other then the Kardashian family they actually have figured out what they want and have held out for what they want…</p>
<p>For those interested in the reference to Harville Hendrix, the book I am referring to is ‘Getting the love you deserve’.</p>