The Road to War: USA versus Iran?

<p>The UN will solve this problem hopefully…so we should let Great Britain head this operation since they are the next strongest in line. And not neccessarily that the whole Islamic world will just hold hands with Iran and fight Israel…If America attacks Iran, there will be no doubt that this might happen but the Islamic world wont just attack Israel, but Iran might</p>

<p>The UN won’t do anything. The US should allow Israel to attack Iran first, but should still support Israel with money, weapons, and troops. Israel would not be alone in fighting Iran. The only benefit of having Israel attack first is that is would save what little reputation the US has in the world. It would be different from Iraq because Israel actually has a reason to attack Iran, where as we really do not. </p>

<p>And yes, there probably will be another draft. Serving your country should not be a chore. It should be something in which citizens are eager to help protect their country from enemies.</p>

<p>Are you kidding me bestmiler1? The whole arab world has hated Israel since it was created nearly 60 years ago. Name one middle eastern country that would not take advantage of this chance to attack Israel.</p>

<p>protect us…from whom please elaborate and with facts not propoganda</p>

<p>CGM,</p>

<p>do you believe that the current President of Iran wants nuclear power for peaceful reasons? If you do that’s fine, but many people will disagree. And obviously we won’t know for sure until it’s too late.</p>

<p>^^^ about that, i actually DID believe it. The recent talk about israel facing soon annihilation has changed my opinion. I always considered Iran hostile but now, with uranium enrichment, the threats, and those recent weapons tests the picture is getting more clear that theyre up to something big.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Not necessarily. It could be just puffing up their chests, standing their hair on end, and sabre rattling to look aggressive and frighten off would be aggressors. </p>

<p>Mini is quite right. If you think about it logically…from Iran’s perspective, they are surrounded on two sides by US military occupations. The Bush administration has to be viewed (again from Iran’s perspective) as having a hair-trigger. I can certainly understand their posturing.</p>

<p>It actually would be a smart move to ratchet down our own rhetoric and open up some diplomatic channels with Iran. If we can do business with a Shia theocracy in Iraq, then why not with the next-door neighbors?</p>

<p>Of course, that kind of Kissingeresque realpolitik is out-of-fashion inside the beltway these days.</p>

<p>I think that sooner or later some muslim (terrorist) country will start world war III with its nuclear weapons. Here is a possible scenerio: One country sees nukes hit its ally. The ally of attacked country will attack the ally’s enemies. The enemies will attack with nukes as well. This will lead to a chain reaction of nuclear attacks. Even if Iran is kept from developing these weapons some other country will and it is inevitable for a nuclear war to start some time in the future.</p>

<p>Oh, this is simply a bunch of sabre-rattling so that GWB can reward his friends in the oil biz. Anyone see oil futures this morning?</p>

<p>But, it’s true - democracy does scare him.</p>

<p>“The UN will solve this problem hopefully…”</p>

<pre><code> Yeah, right. The UN has done absolutely nothing in world history except threaten to place sanctions on a rebel country. I doubt the UN will do anything with this.
</code></pre>

<p>Thanks to Wikiquote, here are a few clues to Iran’s peaceful intentions. Or shall I say, quotes?:</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Yeap. I say he’s peaceful.</p>

<p>The Israeli Defense Force can’t handle Iran; if it converts into offensive mode and attacks Iran, that’ll be an excuse for the entirety of the Middle East to wage war and hell. Then we’d be in a pickle, wouldn’t be. Israel would be defending all right – against the entirety of Arabia.</p>

<p>The United Nations isn’t going to do anything. The internal bureaucracy is too inefficient to do anything by itself; the scandal and corruption that’s seeded deeply inside the chambers of the General Assembly, the Secretariat, and other functions of the United Nations will suck the life of the UN before it can move to act.</p>

<p>The United States isn’t going to do anything. We’re too busy in Iraq. And Afghanistan. </p>

<p>Iran isn’t going to do anything. Ahmadinejad has Kim Jong-Il Syndrome, where he attempts to swagger his authority by publicly announcing what he ate for breakfast the morning before.</p>

<p>Didn’t see oil futures but Gold is way up.</p>

<p>Oil futures over $70 in Asia this morning. GWB’s wildcatting friends are making a big bundle, then things will cool off, and everyone is happy! ;)</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12351695/[/url]”>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12351695/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Another bombing today in Israel at a falafel stand near Tel Aviv. I think the Fatah party has claimed responsibility but Hamas is supporting them for the attack. Israel is promising to respond and I think this very well could be the spark that ignites the fight. If Israel responds in Palestine, Iran could very well become an ally of Palestine with the world becoming divided over the middle east.</p>

<p>Well now its seems the War with Iran is inevitable…it will happen, both Iran and Israel are waiting for that big spark</p>

<p>Yep, the US is getting ready too. </p>

<p><a href=“http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/17/bush.shake.up/[/url]”>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/17/bush.shake.up/&lt;/a&gt;
It looks like Bolton just told his aides to leave now if they are going to leave. According to Scott McClellan, Bolton “would prefer to make changes at one time and wants a team that will stick it out to help President Bush accomplish his second-term goals.”</p>

<p>^ yea i saw that earlier today
i thought that was more of a change in the cabinet rather than international affairs.</p>

<p>Well, you wouldnt like to see someone leaving for “personal reasons” in the middle of an invasion, would you?</p>

<p>;)</p>

<p>Well, you can bet your money that if the U.S. launches air strikes against Iran, then the theocratic republic will at the minimum respond by launching scud missiles at Israel(Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, etc.). Forget college admissions HS Class of 07, it looks its the DRAFT for us as we’ve been bestowed the honoir of serving this <em>great</em> country and its <em>intelligent</em> leaders. Iran isn’t going down without a fight…:(</p>