happening at my school as well. know multiple olympiad qualifiers (usabo, usamo, usapho) with no id
just not enough spots out there for people. especially in eecs. im applied to eecs and have fairly competitive stats and from an underprivileged area yet didnt get the id. most people i know donāt have it either. the only people i know are those accepted to ucla with me and an architecture major
perhaps these kidsā majors play a part
Itās crazy and questionable of who theyāre accepting since these kids are getting big tech schools like MIT, Princeton, UIUC, CMU but Berkeley ignoring
Thank ā ā ā ā ā ā ā god I got LA so I donāt need Berkeley
thereās always one UC a year that has really strange results. i feel like irvine was that one a few years back but this year it seems like davis or berkeley
Zeemee kids will love this guy
I donāt think you understand the prestige of those competitions
As of now the Berkeley ID Data form has proven 2 things:
- College Confidential is Incredibly Biased
- Of those on CC, the number of those who hold a GPA above UCBās Median is Huge.
Effectively, this just encourages the idea that everyone here is incredibly overqualified. It also supports the Poll bias theory, so it does seem that the Portal Astrology is correct. (Or at least capable of picking out qualified applicants)
are you upset kids that you didnt give respect to because of their gpa are succeeding?
Guy from my school got into Caltech, didnāt have ID for EECS. Everyone I asked who had the ID, however, was an extremely qualified applicant who I was sure would get in (none of them applied for EECS or CS, though). Berkeley decisions are just weird sometimes.
We never know any kidsā full applications. It can be frustrating, but looks like thatās how college admissions seem to work. Each college looks for their fit I guess. But, we also cannot undermine the efforts of kids who do get selected, irrespective of what college they get.
id like to remind people that berkley doesnt care as much about your gpa as your course rigor and other factors. theyāre much more holistic.
True, but coming from a Poll standpoint, GPA is always the most concrete number we have to compare
Iām not upset itās just surprising since they didnāt have any STEM ECs or awards, just NHS, school clubs but got EECS
you donāt know for sure. some kids who seem completely average have insane ECs or essays. theres also a luck factor
If you go to an uncompetitive california school, definitely possible
what if instead of this we do a yes or no poll if you expected results to be like this for example if you could predict most of your friends outcomes and it correlates to the ID. Because we are mentioning edge cases but maybe we are seeing them since only the people with the edge cases will comment complaining about it
When it comes to course rigor being an important factor, I feel like the opposite was true for the students I know with an ID from my school. One of them has good rigor, the other has fairly good rigor but not outstanding compared to other applicants and one has virtually zero rigor compared to the applicant pool from my school
The ID means acceptance thereās no arguing there