<p>Just for the sake of argument, I’ll give a slightly different perspective:</p>
<p>I don’t think there’s any question that, at schools that offer ED, an ED application is more likely to succeed than an RD application. Schools are willing to take a gamble on a student, but more willing if they know the student will come. This advantage is probably greatest at the level slightly below the tippy-top colleges. At the very top – which includes Amherst – their applicant pools are strong enough and their expected yields high enough that they may not care much about ED vs. RD. (The numbers still suggest there is some advantage.) But at the Kenyons and Colbys – places that should interest your daughter, too – which are competing for many of the same students as Amherst, I think (and I think the numbers suggest) that the advantage is pretty big. Farther down the food chain, an ED application may effectively guarantee acceptance, but that may not matter so much if the school would be a safety with an RD application.</p>
<p>So I think it’s wrong to say “Don’t apply ED for the boost in chances.” It’s a legitimate strategy decision. Your child has to like the college enough to be happy about going there, but doesn’t necessarily have to be madly in love after visiting every other college in the universe. Personally, I’m a big believer in the adaptive capacity of 18-year-olds, and I think that in most cases a kid will be happy with a decent ED college, even if hypothetically there might be some slightly more perfect institution out there. It’s perfectly legit for a kid to say “I’d go to Yale over Middlebury if I got in, but my chances at Yale are low enough, and I like Middlebury enough, that I’m willing to forgo a shot at Yale to boost my chances at Middlebury.” Lots and lots of kids do just that, and they do it because it’s rational. </p>
<p>Another advantage of ED, not much discussed in this thread yet, is that if it works it makes like better for a kid instantly. Christmas vacation (with RD deadlines looming), February and March were not great times for my kids their senior years; ED kids got to enjoy life a lot more.</p>
<p>For all of the foregoing reasons, most sophisticated private schools I know strongly encourage kids to select an ED school and apply to it. And that helps with their overall success in college admissions, and improves the quality of life for everyone.</p>
<p>You’ll notice I haven’t discussed financial aid yet. Everyone is right: if you are sensitive to differences in aid packages, your child shouldn’t apply ED (and that’s not fair). But before you make that decision, you ought to look carefully at the college’s aid history and try to get a sense of whether you can live with the likely package (and whether $3-5,000/yr. more from a different school would change your daughter’s choice). Not everyone makes the same judgment on that. Also, some schools (not Amherst) do have significant merit scholarships that get awarded to ED students.</p>
<p>ED is pretty much the norm in the tony-LAC world, but you should also be aware of EA schools (no commitment to attend if accepted) like Georgetown and Chicago and the rolling admissions programs at most public universities. These give you some of the benefits of ED (maybe a little boost, maybe a little peace of mind, access to merit scholarships) without the downside.</p>
<p>So . . . my bottom line is nowhere near as negative as most of the posts above. It’s something to think about. But, if your creative-writing kid is mainly focused on Amherst, you are not very far along in your process.</p>