<p>Um, can I say something? Apologies in advance for a LONG post as I am in the field.</p>
<p>First, let me get to the point with your questions.</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Should I be pushing her harder to look at smaller/private universities or should I let her go to Alabama or Oklahoma?
Wherever as long there’s a strong history department (in my criteria- range of professors, minimum of 4-5 in US and Europe, 2 in other areas, demands a thesis, and offers a historian’s workshop course as part of major requirement)</p></li>
<li><p>What other Public Us w/ big time sports (possibly better history depts) should she consdier?
Any Big 10- Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio State, Penn State, Indiana, Illinois, etc. Really.</p></li>
<li><p>If she goes to a big time sports school and works hard, what are her chances of becoming a history prof?
10 humanities PhD students enter in the program. 5 drop out for various reasons (flunking the comprehensive exams, family obligations, and reality are primary reasons). 1 doesn’t finish the dissertation and doesn’t get a job. 2 get jobs in community colleges. 1 gets tenure-track but gets denied tenure after six years. The last student lands a TT job and gets tenured. So… 1 in 10 chance. Or less.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>Now, the nitty-gritty.</p>
<p>I couldn’t even imagine myself being a professional historian in HS even though my AP Euro teacher was a huge inspiration to study history. I had no idea what I wanted to do with my future when I entered college. Eventually it stuck in my head by my junior year that I wanted to get PhD in history, in particular United States or Jewish, because I LOVE research. I interned in museums every summer. I spent a semester abroad in Israel to begin studying Hebrew and kept up with the language in my senior year. I did a senior thesis (and loved every minute of it). I applied to 3 PhD programs to work with these specific professors. Got rejected from all of them, citing that my lack of foreign languages, strong knowledge of the field to develop compelling questions and thoughts, or writing as reasons for my rejection. In the meantime, I rushed to apply to 2 MA programs and got accepted to both. I chose Michigan as costs were comparable and I preferred the professor there. I had been told that MA programs were stepping stones to the PhD and good ways to get one’s feet wet in the academia.</p>
<p>I set goals in my MA program and accomplished them. I wrote an exceptionally strong MA thesis that has created interest among academics who know my work. I picked up 2 more languages (German and Yiddish). Did fine in my coursework. Gained in-depth perspective on the field (granted, it was a publish-or-perish institution) that really helped me to conduct myself in much more professional manner. I applied to 5 PhD programs to work with certain groups of professors. Got rejected from 3 and waitlisted at 2. Never got off the waitlists though one was quite apologetic. I was expecting not to get in most programs but was definitely stunned that I didn’t get in ANYWHERE because I had such strong statement of purpose, interesting thesis for writing sample, and influential letter of recommendations.</p>
<p>And now… I am preparing for my THIRD round of PhD applications. And applying for jobs to fill my time. And focusing on re-taking the GRE and revising my MA thesis for publication.</p>
<p>Most people take 2 cycles before they get in anywhere with funding. Successful students get grants and fellowships which lead to MORE grants and fellowships that are important for one’s CV when applying for TT jobs. That’s part of the reason why people with common sense refuse to enter in a PhD program without a full funding package. Money is truly everything.</p>
<p>The most common reasons why students don’t get in the first time are A) lack of foreign languages (especially for Europe (French or German), Latin America (Spanish), and Asia (country’s primary language)) or B) poorly constructed statement of purpose (first thing that adcoms look at) or C) unpolished writing sample.</p>
<p>History PHD programs like to see applicants spending a little time off (a year or two is fine) to work on their languages, develop professional skills in history-related field, or just plain take a mental break. Because graduate school is so tough and academia is rather brutal, it’s so easy for students to burn out. And history programs hate to see burned out students because it’s quite an investment for them (We’re talking about financing $40-60,000 per student and multiply that anywhere from 5 to 25 students per class).</p>
<p>History professors don’t become professors because they like to teach. They do in order to get research grants and opportunities. If the history department’s pleasant enough, then they do admit that they like to teach. Otherwise, they’d rather spend their time writing their books and doing research than to teach survey courses.</p>
<p>But if your D shows promise and passion in the eyes of her professors wherever she goes, she WILL get help and assistance in preparing for a PhD. Since languages are so crucial, if she isn’t entirely sure what field to do, she should at least start with French or German and make it into literature level, before dropping or switching to another language.</p>
<p>So tell your D to get ready for a very long road ahead of her and that’s just getting into a PhD program, not the tenure.</p>