<p>Sooz - Even accounting for population, even accounting for women’s deaths (which the data I shared did), there are FAR more violent deaths in the U.S. than in Pakistan. (And, in 2009, more than half those deaths were caused not by Pakistanis, but by U.S. drones.)</p>
<p>Yes, the Northwest part of Pakistan is likely the most violent place on earth, and I wouldn’t go there. (I wrote Peshawar in my first post). Same is true for Quetta, and likely Karachi. And in the Northwest part in particular, more than half the deaths come from U.S. drones.</p>
<p>As in the U.S., the entire country isn’t unsafe (though, relative to elsewhere, I am amazed at how violent the U.S. really is relative to other places, and how oblivious Americans are to it.) There are particular places, and for particular groups of people. Upscale U.S. colleges for women. One study suggests that 1 in 5 U.S. college women are raped or sexually assaulted. Fewer than 1 in 20 are reported. Most receive few if any services. (The Notre Dame rape cases are highly instructive.) Women in general in the U.S. are at risk, with the numbers at higher than 1 in 5 (not counting child sexual abuse, where very, very few cases are reported). Services for most are slim to none.</p>
<p>As in the U.S., risks aren’t the same for everyone, as some populations receive more protection than others. In Pakistan, embassy/consular personnel are probably top of the list, and especially the women attached. Next would likely be NGO personnel and, again, especially women. Which is why the OP’s d. should be in close communication with the NGO about the details of said protection. (And, no, U.S. women not in relationships with Pakistani men are, by definition, not subject to domestic violence assaults. They are not subject to dowry murders, acid throwing, etc. Though those numbers, when resulting in death, are included in the violent death statistics data.)</p>
<p>Am I saying the OP’s d. should go? No, I am saying she should do a realistic risk appraisal, relative to her reasons for going, and act accordingly. Most of what I have read here isn’t even close. (And yes, I am concerned that she won’t talk to her mother about it.) And Sooz’s point about “right now” is also fair - though it interesting to say the least that anti-U.S. demonstrations, etc., have all fizzled (according to my Washington Post this morning.)</p>
<p>The biggest risk by far is still getting into a car there.</p>